Freedom of speech is a cornerstone of our society. There is a somewhat cathartic irony when reading and following Cindy Sheehan's journey, claimed over the grieving of her son. Cindy enjoys a society so completely open that a formerly obscure woman can squat on land adjacent to our President's Texas home, garnering media attention, as if she were celebrity or recognized diplomat. Her beautiful child died defending the freedom's required for her 15 minutes of fame. She boldly stands shameless in her claim of glitter and spotlight otherwise unavailable to her.
How marvelous that our open society is able to witness, first hand, her grief unfold. As it does, she appears to be experiencing an apparent savant like understanding of geopolitical strategic planning and Sun Tsu like wisdom.
Mystically crowds have gathered in support of Cindy as she kisses newly arriving strangers in a manner reserved, in polite company, for intimate friends. And now, the ranks or wannabe ranks of Hollywood have weighed in for another good measure of simplistic wisdom.
Christine Lahti, the 50 something fading star, has surfaced like recovered pieces of a shipwreck. Perhaps her role as Rose in Revenge of the Middle-Aged Woman (2004) has become her own reality. In fact, while slightly past the middle age range, Miss Lahti would offer prescience as she claims to know that President Bush is scared shitless of Cindy Sheehan.
How do we comfort them? How can we bring them home from their delusional roadside chirpings? Perhaps theirs and others who have joined them are better left to vent and rant at will as daily witness to the fact that the defense of our nation, our freedom and our future will come today and tomorrow at a monumental cost. The final cost will be determined, not within our lives or our children or grandchildren's lives. The cost of freedom will be paid each day an open society must defend against the thieves of freedom.
It would be heartless and impossible to ignore Mrs. Sheehan's loss and grief, but not impossible to question her motives, and her willingness to leverage her quilt for a misguided counterproductive end.
Susan Moses
---------------------------
SUNDAY • AUGUST 14, 2005
*BUSH PROTESTING MOM CALLS FOR 'ISRAEL OUT OF PALESTINE'; VOWS NOT TO PAY TAXES: Anti-war protestor Cindy Sheehan, whose soldier son Casey was killed in Iraq, is calling for Bush's "impeachment," and for Israel to get out of Palestine! "You get America out of Iraq and Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism," Sheehan declares. Sheehan, who is asking for a second meeting with President Bush, says defiantly: "My son was killed in 2004. I am not paying my taxes for 2004. You killed my son, George Bush, and I don't owe you a penny...you give my son back and I'll pay my taxes. Come after me (for back taxes) and we'll put this war on trial." "And now I'm going to use another 'I' word - impeachment - because we cannot have these people pardoned. They need to be tried on war crimes and go to jail." The 48-year-old California mom remains tented up in a ditch along the one-lane road that leads to Bush's Texas ranch. As her protest entered its second week, hundreds of people with conflicting opinions about the war in Iraq descended on the area. Time mag reports in new editions on Monday: Sheehan gets support from her surviving son, Andy, in principle, but he recently sent her a long e-mail imploring her, "to come home because you need to support us at home."
-----------
*LBN-POLITICAL BRIEFING by Christine Lahti: Cindy Sheehan is my hero. She is the hero of all Americans who make up the 62% of us who oppose this war. As an American exercising her right to free speech, she is a brave, passionate, living example of democracy, and she has the undeniable force and the moral authority of a grieving mother. Being a mother of three, I can't even imagine the depths of the grief she must feel having lost her son in this horrific war. But I can imagine that her grief and rage -- her demand for justice and action -- is a force that is unstoppable. No wonder Bush is intimidated. No wonder he can't even walk down his driveway. He is scared shitless. Whether he acknowledges it or not -- whether his aides try to insulate him from the truth or not -- his hands are covered in the blood of Cindy Sheehan's son.
The above were found in the Late Breaking News online bulletin:lbnelert@earthlink.net
-----------------------------
Sunday, August 14, 2005
Monday, August 01, 2005
The Bus Bitch! - O
Every actor’s greatest fear is obscurity. The day they are not acknowledged for“something” their fragile egos crack like Humpty Dumpty’s eggshell, and often there is no putting it all back together again.
Jane who?
The aging Missy is fighting hard to counter the truth she sees in her own mirror. Her vacuous shell of a body is unrecognizable to her as it fads into obscurity. She does not have a famous or powerful husband to afford her spotlight. Her veiled apology over her treasonous Viet Nam war activities fell on deaf ears, translating to lack luster book sales. Now she is working from a position of weakness by attempting to garner what little spotlight she can muster.Her final desperate act will have little or no impact on what America or the world thinks.
The final piece of luck remaining for this heinous wretch is that she never played lover to a Kennedy, so alas she continues to breathe. Perhaps oxygen will become her nemesis when she can no longer face the truth reflected from her own mirror.
Thank God for our freedom of speech, for without it the idiots would be more difficult to identify.
Jane who?
The aging Missy is fighting hard to counter the truth she sees in her own mirror. Her vacuous shell of a body is unrecognizable to her as it fads into obscurity. She does not have a famous or powerful husband to afford her spotlight. Her veiled apology over her treasonous Viet Nam war activities fell on deaf ears, translating to lack luster book sales. Now she is working from a position of weakness by attempting to garner what little spotlight she can muster.Her final desperate act will have little or no impact on what America or the world thinks.
The final piece of luck remaining for this heinous wretch is that she never played lover to a Kennedy, so alas she continues to breathe. Perhaps oxygen will become her nemesis when she can no longer face the truth reflected from her own mirror.
Thank God for our freedom of speech, for without it the idiots would be more difficult to identify.
Thursday, July 07, 2005
L'extrémité est près de mes amis - O
"Fin de regne" for Chirac, apparently too much cheese! Lessons, lessons. Oh the joy of living long enough to see life's sweet justice. Perhaps the French have finally had enough of the domestic consequence of acquiescing to evil extremist's demands.
They are quickly turning on Chirac as his POLLS are dropping like the turd he is. The liberal press must take another opened eye to consequences, because ultimately people will grow tired of the promises of more, when the result is more sacrifice, more struggle, more economic losses. Herald, the Soviet Union no more!
The soon to be Islamic Republic of France is on the verge of its own crisis and where are the media whores to cover the catastrophe? Sucking up to Robert Redford who would use his vast experience and education to demand that journalists investigate the Bush administration for its "Watergate like" activities. Not even George Soros can save him, but then George is busy trying to drive the world oil markets into disaster. Alas, another genius at work.
Perhaps with luck the Grim Reaper will bring a just end for Chirac before he suffers the kind of slow, painful political death meant only for the most worthless pieces of human waste.
May he endure long suffering for every tear shed by families who have lost ones in Iraq as a result of his refusal to share in the human and financial costs of the war. That he should pay dearly for each Iraqi family who has suffered as a result of his deals with Saddam would be too kind. Each of his last days should justifiably reflect the injustice he caused by his words and actions against our nation and government.
Even yesterday as he boldly struck his blows against England with his unkind remarks and mean spirited jokes, Karma has taken him into its sights and again, we cheer,
"Fin de regne" for Chirac.
They are quickly turning on Chirac as his POLLS are dropping like the turd he is. The liberal press must take another opened eye to consequences, because ultimately people will grow tired of the promises of more, when the result is more sacrifice, more struggle, more economic losses. Herald, the Soviet Union no more!
The soon to be Islamic Republic of France is on the verge of its own crisis and where are the media whores to cover the catastrophe? Sucking up to Robert Redford who would use his vast experience and education to demand that journalists investigate the Bush administration for its "Watergate like" activities. Not even George Soros can save him, but then George is busy trying to drive the world oil markets into disaster. Alas, another genius at work.
Perhaps with luck the Grim Reaper will bring a just end for Chirac before he suffers the kind of slow, painful political death meant only for the most worthless pieces of human waste.
May he endure long suffering for every tear shed by families who have lost ones in Iraq as a result of his refusal to share in the human and financial costs of the war. That he should pay dearly for each Iraqi family who has suffered as a result of his deals with Saddam would be too kind. Each of his last days should justifiably reflect the injustice he caused by his words and actions against our nation and government.
Even yesterday as he boldly struck his blows against England with his unkind remarks and mean spirited jokes, Karma has taken him into its sights and again, we cheer,
"Fin de regne" for Chirac.
Thursday, March 03, 2005
Conversion Perversion - O
Will the lastest European religious conversion trends infect teens in the US? I had drinks with a colleague from Europe last night. His company co-finances large film projects from funds available throughout the EU. That is important to this note, because it establishes the foundation for his access to the events impacting societies within each of the EU countries. He regularly travels to the EU countries meeting with banks, government funds ministers and private investors. His access is to and with the socially elite, their children and their families.
The most striking aspect of our conversation was wrapped around his observation that there are increasing numbers of European teens converting to Islam, in particular, young women. It appears that the mystique of the testosterone, Muslim, radical male has become the GQ man for the insatiable fantasies of the German, French, and Dutch females. Head covers are popping up all over with claims of absolute devotion to the dark mysterious men who have lured them into the growing family of global Islam.
The Beatles, long hair, punk rock, Twiggy, skinny models and fashion trends came to the US from Europe. The Q-? of the day is whether or not this “conversion perversion” will make its way into mainstream America. One could conclude, as we witness the daily, aggressive challenges to the God based core of our own foundation, that the template is being etched for just such a movement to take its hold on our society. I can’t wait for Bebe, Versace, and DKNY to bring the Burka fashion statement onto the runways and onto the covers of major fashion magazines. It may be the long awaited solution to female pattern balding.
The most striking aspect of our conversation was wrapped around his observation that there are increasing numbers of European teens converting to Islam, in particular, young women. It appears that the mystique of the testosterone, Muslim, radical male has become the GQ man for the insatiable fantasies of the German, French, and Dutch females. Head covers are popping up all over with claims of absolute devotion to the dark mysterious men who have lured them into the growing family of global Islam.
The Beatles, long hair, punk rock, Twiggy, skinny models and fashion trends came to the US from Europe. The Q-? of the day is whether or not this “conversion perversion” will make its way into mainstream America. One could conclude, as we witness the daily, aggressive challenges to the God based core of our own foundation, that the template is being etched for just such a movement to take its hold on our society. I can’t wait for Bebe, Versace, and DKNY to bring the Burka fashion statement onto the runways and onto the covers of major fashion magazines. It may be the long awaited solution to female pattern balding.
Monday, February 07, 2005
The Thrill of the Kill - O
As I read the article “Intimate Killing” in Washington Times, (BELOW) I formed a mental image of a virtual Pinball machine in which the little balls are media hacks. As the spring driven lever is pulled and one by one the little balls hit the open spaces of the game’s interior, hoping to rack up huge score points, they find that they will spend their time bouncing between a number of strategically positioned obstacles. The obstacles represent things that the little balls love to take issue with but are not big enough to overcome. As a consequence of the encounter between the little balls and the obstacles, the little balls trigger a series of noises, bells and whistles. Finally, the little balls become impotent and roll to safety within the bowels of the game, waiting to be launched again and again, with some expectation of one day bringing down the obstacles, thus making the ultimate career score.
The points raised by Robert H. Scales, author of Intimate Killing, take issue with one such obstacle. Scales, obviously experienced with the thrill of the kill, has taken his own swack at the impotent little balls who have retreated to keyboard sanctuaries to take a swack at an American hero. Reporters making a big deal about comments, made by Lt. Gen. Jim Mattis Bravo Robert, have made a big noise lasting less time than the last gasping breath of the bad men our military are killing.
Any serious shooter knows that the thrill resultant from pulling the trigger is directly connected to the motivation and intention created within the moment. My favorite Christmas Eve daytime activity is to take my arsenal and my kids to a private outdoor range in the high desert near Edwards AFB. While the rest of the world prepares for the phony fat guy in the polyester red suit to arrive, we squeeze off round after round creating a variety of role plays requiring us to be focused on killing some bad person who otherwise, lacking our complete success, would kill us. We love the idea of being able to defend ourselves from bad people. We have fun while we do it.
For those of us not grounded in military experiences, Stallone, Bruce Lee, Arnold, and Clint have given life to some of the baddest good guys cinema has created. The public understands very well that bad guys should die and good guys should win because we can identify with the hero and love it when he wins. We cheer, shout, jump up and generally enjoy it when the bad guy gets killed. I feel pretty confident that most would call the experience of killing the bad guy by proxy, fun.
Susan Moses
Beverly Hills, CA
---------------------------------------------
Washington TimesFebruary 7, 2005 Pg. 19
'Intimate Killing'Close combat and the art of warBy Robert H. Scales
On Wednesday, I had the pleasure of moderating a panel on the future of warfare. Marine Lt. Gen. Jim Mattis was one of the panelists. During his remarks he made a statement about the pleasure that young soldiers and marines feel when killing in close combat, a statement that seems to have gotten him in trouble with the fourth estate — prompting an apology and some counseling by the Marine Corps Commandant.First, a confession: I know Gen. Mattis. He is a central figure in the book I coauthored with Williamson Murray, "The Iraq War: A Military History." For those of you who might have the image of a knuckle-dragging troglodyte, let me assure you that he is one of the most urbane and polished men I have known. He can quote Homer as well as Sun Tzu and has over 7,000 books in his personal library.Jim is the product of three decades of schooling and practice in the art of war. No one on active duty knows more about the subject. He is an infantryman, a close-combat Marine. He is one of those very few who willingly practices the art of what social scientists term "intimate killing." Those of us who have engaged in the act understand what he was trying to explain to an audience of defense technologists and contractors.Intimate killing is a primal aspect of warfare unchanged since the beginning of civilization. It involves a clash of two warriors, one on one, armed with virtually identical weapons. The decision goes to the soldier with the right stuff, the one with the greater cunning, strength, guile, ruthlessness and will to win.For a moment put yourself in the place of a young soldier or Marine fighting house to house in the mean streets of Fallujah. Burdened with over 60 pounds of gear, sweat dripping constantly into your face, you can't stop shaking from the fear of what the enemy has in store for you around the next corner. Just ahead is a darkened house with doors and windows closed and shuttered. The only sound is the crunching of your boots on the trash and broken glass as you move in slow motion to surround the dwelling. You watch as the sergeant signals you to cover a side entrance. Through the faint haze you can see your buddy kick in the door and immediately come face to face with an insurgent who greets him with a burst of AK-47 fire that tears a hole in his chest. Your buddy doesn't die. The terrorist wants him to live just long enough for his buddies to rush in for a rescue and become additional trophies to be laid at the altar of heaven.Now, it's your turn. You use your superior discipline and skill to approach the insurgent such that you're detected just at the last second. Both of you raise your weapons simultaneously and open fire in a crushing tear of bullets that scatter and ricochet wildly across the room. One bullet finds the bad guy and he falls in a bloody lump just inches from your boots.What exactly do you "feel" at this moment? Relief, to be sure, but also something else that cannot be explained to anyone who hasn't committed an act of intimate killing. It's not joy, exactly, more like exhilaration and an enormous sense of self-satisfaction that in one of the most primal challenges — where all the satellites, planes, ships and smart weapons are of no use whatever — you prevailed, one on one, over a diabolically evil enemy.Who should be offended by the emotions of "joy" or whatever one feels at the moment of a successful kill? It's a fair fight, you win and the bad guy loses. It's that simple. One more terrorist will not threaten your unit or your buddies. Remember, this isn't a reality show. There are no retakes. Donald Trump doesn't fire you and the price for second place is death.My point simply is this: We must celebrate the fact that we have men like Jim Mattis willing to devote (and give) their lives when necessary to commit an act that most of those in our society would be horrified to even contemplate. If you are offended by these emotions, then seriously consider joining an Army or Marine infantry unit so that you can demonstrate how to kill an enemy in a more humane and politically correct manner.Until such an unlikely day occurs, we must all remember that leaders like Gen. Mattis and the men he commands are the rarest commodities that a protected society like ours can produce. All they want is the opportunity to serve a country that truly appreciates the difficulty and dangers inherent in the duties they perform, duties that very few are willing even to contemplate.
Retired Maj. Robert H. Scales is a former commander of the Army War College.
The points raised by Robert H. Scales, author of Intimate Killing, take issue with one such obstacle. Scales, obviously experienced with the thrill of the kill, has taken his own swack at the impotent little balls who have retreated to keyboard sanctuaries to take a swack at an American hero. Reporters making a big deal about comments, made by Lt. Gen. Jim Mattis Bravo Robert, have made a big noise lasting less time than the last gasping breath of the bad men our military are killing.
Any serious shooter knows that the thrill resultant from pulling the trigger is directly connected to the motivation and intention created within the moment. My favorite Christmas Eve daytime activity is to take my arsenal and my kids to a private outdoor range in the high desert near Edwards AFB. While the rest of the world prepares for the phony fat guy in the polyester red suit to arrive, we squeeze off round after round creating a variety of role plays requiring us to be focused on killing some bad person who otherwise, lacking our complete success, would kill us. We love the idea of being able to defend ourselves from bad people. We have fun while we do it.
For those of us not grounded in military experiences, Stallone, Bruce Lee, Arnold, and Clint have given life to some of the baddest good guys cinema has created. The public understands very well that bad guys should die and good guys should win because we can identify with the hero and love it when he wins. We cheer, shout, jump up and generally enjoy it when the bad guy gets killed. I feel pretty confident that most would call the experience of killing the bad guy by proxy, fun.
Susan Moses
Beverly Hills, CA
---------------------------------------------
Washington TimesFebruary 7, 2005 Pg. 19
'Intimate Killing'Close combat and the art of warBy Robert H. Scales
On Wednesday, I had the pleasure of moderating a panel on the future of warfare. Marine Lt. Gen. Jim Mattis was one of the panelists. During his remarks he made a statement about the pleasure that young soldiers and marines feel when killing in close combat, a statement that seems to have gotten him in trouble with the fourth estate — prompting an apology and some counseling by the Marine Corps Commandant.First, a confession: I know Gen. Mattis. He is a central figure in the book I coauthored with Williamson Murray, "The Iraq War: A Military History." For those of you who might have the image of a knuckle-dragging troglodyte, let me assure you that he is one of the most urbane and polished men I have known. He can quote Homer as well as Sun Tzu and has over 7,000 books in his personal library.Jim is the product of three decades of schooling and practice in the art of war. No one on active duty knows more about the subject. He is an infantryman, a close-combat Marine. He is one of those very few who willingly practices the art of what social scientists term "intimate killing." Those of us who have engaged in the act understand what he was trying to explain to an audience of defense technologists and contractors.Intimate killing is a primal aspect of warfare unchanged since the beginning of civilization. It involves a clash of two warriors, one on one, armed with virtually identical weapons. The decision goes to the soldier with the right stuff, the one with the greater cunning, strength, guile, ruthlessness and will to win.For a moment put yourself in the place of a young soldier or Marine fighting house to house in the mean streets of Fallujah. Burdened with over 60 pounds of gear, sweat dripping constantly into your face, you can't stop shaking from the fear of what the enemy has in store for you around the next corner. Just ahead is a darkened house with doors and windows closed and shuttered. The only sound is the crunching of your boots on the trash and broken glass as you move in slow motion to surround the dwelling. You watch as the sergeant signals you to cover a side entrance. Through the faint haze you can see your buddy kick in the door and immediately come face to face with an insurgent who greets him with a burst of AK-47 fire that tears a hole in his chest. Your buddy doesn't die. The terrorist wants him to live just long enough for his buddies to rush in for a rescue and become additional trophies to be laid at the altar of heaven.Now, it's your turn. You use your superior discipline and skill to approach the insurgent such that you're detected just at the last second. Both of you raise your weapons simultaneously and open fire in a crushing tear of bullets that scatter and ricochet wildly across the room. One bullet finds the bad guy and he falls in a bloody lump just inches from your boots.What exactly do you "feel" at this moment? Relief, to be sure, but also something else that cannot be explained to anyone who hasn't committed an act of intimate killing. It's not joy, exactly, more like exhilaration and an enormous sense of self-satisfaction that in one of the most primal challenges — where all the satellites, planes, ships and smart weapons are of no use whatever — you prevailed, one on one, over a diabolically evil enemy.Who should be offended by the emotions of "joy" or whatever one feels at the moment of a successful kill? It's a fair fight, you win and the bad guy loses. It's that simple. One more terrorist will not threaten your unit or your buddies. Remember, this isn't a reality show. There are no retakes. Donald Trump doesn't fire you and the price for second place is death.My point simply is this: We must celebrate the fact that we have men like Jim Mattis willing to devote (and give) their lives when necessary to commit an act that most of those in our society would be horrified to even contemplate. If you are offended by these emotions, then seriously consider joining an Army or Marine infantry unit so that you can demonstrate how to kill an enemy in a more humane and politically correct manner.Until such an unlikely day occurs, we must all remember that leaders like Gen. Mattis and the men he commands are the rarest commodities that a protected society like ours can produce. All they want is the opportunity to serve a country that truly appreciates the difficulty and dangers inherent in the duties they perform, duties that very few are willing even to contemplate.
Retired Maj. Robert H. Scales is a former commander of the Army War College.
Friday, February 04, 2005
Thursday, December 16, 2004
Take Santa Out of Christmas - O
Ok, so they don’t want Jesus in Christmas anymore. Whoever “they” are. They would be the ones who object to nativity scenes, to the Passion of Christ, and to the singing of songs rejoicing in the birth of Jesus Christ. They don’t want plays in schools about the birth of Christ, or songs or any reference to Christianity. It scares them.
Let them have December. I don’t want Christmas in December anymore, and I want to remove Santa Claus from any part of the celebration of Christ’s birth. Let “them” have the Holidays, whatever their Holidays are. Let them keep Santa and December and the frantic rush to spend money that no one has, on things no ones needs, to fulfill some expectation that no one has ever actually defined. If Christians stopped supporting the commercialization and distortion of the sacred Holy day, how would Sears, and Starbucks and the malls survive? Actually, that would not be my problem.
My problem is the ground swell to kill the very reason we celebrate Christmas – hello “it’s about the C H R I S T in Christ MASS.
I vote to move the celebration of Christ’s birth to the spring. The Gospels refer to Jesus birth as occurring shortly before Herod the Great died. History can fix Herod's death with some accuracy. Lunar records reflect an eclipse of the moon just before Herod passed on. The eclipse occurred on March 12th or 13th in 4 B.C. We also know that Herod died just before Passover, which took place on April 11th, in the same year, 4 B.C.
I can visualize some really cool spring celebrations, which could coincide with spring break, so the kids, and grand kids can travel to see gammy and gampa. Spring would provide a more weather friendly time for outings to the fields to see shepherds and sheep, to watch the big sky and embrace the miracle of stars and big lights.
I want to return to the basics, to the essence of the celebration of Christ’s birth. I want to bring back the acknowledgement of heavenly bodies, stars, moons and planets. I would love to frolic in the fields with sheep. Ok, maybe that is taking things a bit too far, but who made our Holy day a commercial spend fest, with a fat guy and flying deer? Why do I have to spend $75 dollars on a dead tree? Why do I have to tip people, who buy the way are probably a part of the “them” group, just because it is Santa Claus day?
No, no, Santa Claus and the ACLU can have December. I want to move the celebration to a time less cluttered with their commercialization. Of course, there will be no more need to have the 24th & 25th of December off, the lines at airport will be significantly reduced, shopping malls will have plenty of parking spots, and no need to sue the schools or cities over nativity scenes, because we will move them to our own special place during the year when it will be obvious who the Christians are. No one will have to pay any attention to our customs and religious celebration. No, anyone who does not wish to be a part of Christmas, can just go about their day, or week, and have December all to themselves.
Thank you, that felt good.
Susan Moses - Beverly Hills, CA
Let them have December. I don’t want Christmas in December anymore, and I want to remove Santa Claus from any part of the celebration of Christ’s birth. Let “them” have the Holidays, whatever their Holidays are. Let them keep Santa and December and the frantic rush to spend money that no one has, on things no ones needs, to fulfill some expectation that no one has ever actually defined. If Christians stopped supporting the commercialization and distortion of the sacred Holy day, how would Sears, and Starbucks and the malls survive? Actually, that would not be my problem.
My problem is the ground swell to kill the very reason we celebrate Christmas – hello “it’s about the C H R I S T in Christ MASS.
I vote to move the celebration of Christ’s birth to the spring. The Gospels refer to Jesus birth as occurring shortly before Herod the Great died. History can fix Herod's death with some accuracy. Lunar records reflect an eclipse of the moon just before Herod passed on. The eclipse occurred on March 12th or 13th in 4 B.C. We also know that Herod died just before Passover, which took place on April 11th, in the same year, 4 B.C.
I can visualize some really cool spring celebrations, which could coincide with spring break, so the kids, and grand kids can travel to see gammy and gampa. Spring would provide a more weather friendly time for outings to the fields to see shepherds and sheep, to watch the big sky and embrace the miracle of stars and big lights.
I want to return to the basics, to the essence of the celebration of Christ’s birth. I want to bring back the acknowledgement of heavenly bodies, stars, moons and planets. I would love to frolic in the fields with sheep. Ok, maybe that is taking things a bit too far, but who made our Holy day a commercial spend fest, with a fat guy and flying deer? Why do I have to spend $75 dollars on a dead tree? Why do I have to tip people, who buy the way are probably a part of the “them” group, just because it is Santa Claus day?
No, no, Santa Claus and the ACLU can have December. I want to move the celebration to a time less cluttered with their commercialization. Of course, there will be no more need to have the 24th & 25th of December off, the lines at airport will be significantly reduced, shopping malls will have plenty of parking spots, and no need to sue the schools or cities over nativity scenes, because we will move them to our own special place during the year when it will be obvious who the Christians are. No one will have to pay any attention to our customs and religious celebration. No, anyone who does not wish to be a part of Christmas, can just go about their day, or week, and have December all to themselves.
Thank you, that felt good.
Susan Moses - Beverly Hills, CA
Monday, November 08, 2004
No More Moore - O
We worked hard and we worked together to assure that our President would serve another four years. Now we need to unite to make sure that the negative energy in Hollywood does not make a mockery of our efforts or the President's role as our CIC.
Today I learned that Hollywood, or more specifically the membership of the Academy of the Motion Picture Arts and Sciences plans to make sure that Fahrenheit 9/11 is nominated for Best Picture and that it will win.
The concept is to use the film to make a statement to America and Washington DC. It is clearly being calculated as a big "up yours America" statement.
There are several things that you can do to assure that your vote is not insulted by the likes of an angry Hollywood and Michael Moore.
First, write to the Academy @:
http://www.oscar.com/contact/index.html
The Academy Awards are aired on ABC. You can contact
ABC @:
Mailing Address:ABC, Inc. 500 S. Buena Vista Street Burbank, CA 91521-4551or email:netaudr@abc.com
The Academy Awards needs an audience and the audience drives the sponsors. Without sponsors the show can NOT go on.
If Moore's film is nominated, I will not support the Oscars. If he wins, I will not support any company, product or service that sponsored the program. Nor will I support ABC.
Because there is a campaign already in place to "assure" that Moore's film wins, it is blatantly obvious that the entire process is "fixed". It is time to let Hollywood know, in case they have not seen the RED counties, that we the people are not impressed, nor do we feel that they represent us.
Please make sure that your voices are heard, send your emails and letters and pass this email on or some form of a call for action to your blogs, your lists, your email groups .....
Nearly 60 million people voted for George Bush on Nov 2, sending a message to the world. I refuse to permit a handful of whacko liberals to dictate the outcome of an awards program which is designed as a direct insult to my vote.
Thank you for your support.
Today I learned that Hollywood, or more specifically the membership of the Academy of the Motion Picture Arts and Sciences plans to make sure that Fahrenheit 9/11 is nominated for Best Picture and that it will win.
The concept is to use the film to make a statement to America and Washington DC. It is clearly being calculated as a big "up yours America" statement.
There are several things that you can do to assure that your vote is not insulted by the likes of an angry Hollywood and Michael Moore.
First, write to the Academy @:
http://www.oscar.com/contact/index.html
The Academy Awards are aired on ABC. You can contact
ABC @:
Mailing Address:ABC, Inc. 500 S. Buena Vista Street Burbank, CA 91521-4551or email:netaudr@abc.com
The Academy Awards needs an audience and the audience drives the sponsors. Without sponsors the show can NOT go on.
If Moore's film is nominated, I will not support the Oscars. If he wins, I will not support any company, product or service that sponsored the program. Nor will I support ABC.
Because there is a campaign already in place to "assure" that Moore's film wins, it is blatantly obvious that the entire process is "fixed". It is time to let Hollywood know, in case they have not seen the RED counties, that we the people are not impressed, nor do we feel that they represent us.
Please make sure that your voices are heard, send your emails and letters and pass this email on or some form of a call for action to your blogs, your lists, your email groups .....
Nearly 60 million people voted for George Bush on Nov 2, sending a message to the world. I refuse to permit a handful of whacko liberals to dictate the outcome of an awards program which is designed as a direct insult to my vote.
Thank you for your support.
Wednesday, November 03, 2004
November 3, 2004 - O
Our wonderful veteran brothers and sisters deserve our praise, our deepest admiration and much of the credit for the re-election of President Bush. The truth has set us free.
May God continue to bless their works and the fruits of their hands. We salute the SwiftVets, The Veterans For Truth and the Vietnam Veterans For Truth and the organizers of the KerryLied/Operation Street Corner. Tom Lipscomb and Dan Collier provided unparallelled insights into John Kerry's character. National radio hosts Limbaugh and Hannity were relentless. Many local and regional hosts, like John Ziegler KFI640 Los Angeles, kept their voices and our focus on the central issue of character.
As a result of the information shared by the veteran community, today we are united with the bravest men and women who have given their service, and we stand with those who are engaged in combat. Their sacrifices support the core of our foundation.
God has truly blessed America, may he continue to bring us together as we address the threats and execute the strikes against our enemies.
The work is not over. The organizations are in place. The Bloggers have established a new standard of communication. Our President will need our support during the next four years. Stay the course and keep the focus.
May God continue to bless their works and the fruits of their hands. We salute the SwiftVets, The Veterans For Truth and the Vietnam Veterans For Truth and the organizers of the KerryLied/Operation Street Corner. Tom Lipscomb and Dan Collier provided unparallelled insights into John Kerry's character. National radio hosts Limbaugh and Hannity were relentless. Many local and regional hosts, like John Ziegler KFI640 Los Angeles, kept their voices and our focus on the central issue of character.
As a result of the information shared by the veteran community, today we are united with the bravest men and women who have given their service, and we stand with those who are engaged in combat. Their sacrifices support the core of our foundation.
God has truly blessed America, may he continue to bring us together as we address the threats and execute the strikes against our enemies.
The work is not over. The organizations are in place. The Bloggers have established a new standard of communication. Our President will need our support during the next four years. Stay the course and keep the focus.
Sunday, October 10, 2004
Kerry Bashing Faith? - O
Sunday, October 10th, 2004
The man is totally out of his element!
Today Sen. Kerry offered a judgment of "some people's faith" and faith based motives and actions while attending a church service during his campaign.
He stood before the congregation and media cameras and said that "Some people seem talk about their faith, but do not have the works to support their faith, and faith without works is dead faith." He went on to state that his faith is supported by works.
Is he out of his mind? His statement implies that anyone who does not believe what he does, is wrong in their faith. What on earth is his problem? How can this person sit in judgment over other people? Is he my god?
Do I need to be Christian, Catholic, Jewish? Was he implying that the Muslim faith is wrong?
I can not help but wonder, who is "in" and who is "out" according to John Kerry? Why on earth would a man who is campaigning on the promise to unite, take a direct "hit" on people for their faith based beliefs because they happen to fall outside of the limited parameters of his own?
"Judge not lest ye be judged, Senator." If the America wanted a religious candidate they would have nominated Jesse Jackson.
Am I the only person offended by his hateful statement?
The man is totally out of his element!
Today Sen. Kerry offered a judgment of "some people's faith" and faith based motives and actions while attending a church service during his campaign.
He stood before the congregation and media cameras and said that "Some people seem talk about their faith, but do not have the works to support their faith, and faith without works is dead faith." He went on to state that his faith is supported by works.
Is he out of his mind? His statement implies that anyone who does not believe what he does, is wrong in their faith. What on earth is his problem? How can this person sit in judgment over other people? Is he my god?
Do I need to be Christian, Catholic, Jewish? Was he implying that the Muslim faith is wrong?
I can not help but wonder, who is "in" and who is "out" according to John Kerry? Why on earth would a man who is campaigning on the promise to unite, take a direct "hit" on people for their faith based beliefs because they happen to fall outside of the limited parameters of his own?
"Judge not lest ye be judged, Senator." If the America wanted a religious candidate they would have nominated Jesse Jackson.
Am I the only person offended by his hateful statement?
Saturday, October 09, 2004
Kerry House Humor - O
MORNING – INT. KERRY bedroom 10/09/04. SEN. JOHN F KERRY (JFK) is in a semi-prom position on the chase lounge. He is wearing underwear with large letters across the frontal genital area spelling BUSH w/a large X through the letters. His wife, TERESA HEINZ KERRY is standing in front of a full mirror. She is wearing a shorty-pajama top with bloomer panties. Her panties have large letters across the frontal genital area spelling BUSH w/a large X through the letters.
JFK
What are you looking at Jackie?
Teresa
I wish that you would not call me that.
JFK
Ok, what are you looking at my precious?
Teresa
I’m feeling old, John, I think I need to see a doctor.
JFK
Sure, sure, I’ll call little John and get the name of
a good OGBYN.
Teresa
You mean OBGYN?
JFK
Yes, that’s what I said, OGBYN.
Teresa
John, you clearly said, OGBYN.
JFK
I might have misspoken about what I
said but I know that everyone knows
what I meant to say. So if I say OGBYN
or OBGYN it all means that same thing.
Teresa
Flip flopper
JFK
Jackie, let’s change the topic. I am hungry.
Teresa
How about a nice bowl of fruit loopholes. There are only a few left and you could get rid of them right now before
you are elected.
JFK
What are you talking about?
Teresa
Loopholes. You talk about them all of
the time and how you are going to get rid of them.
JFK
Never mind. Did you talk to George today?
Teresa
Yes.
JFK
And?
Teresa
And what, John?
JFK
Are the rising oil prices secure through November?
Will his hedge fund people keep the pressure
on? I can’t afford to have cheap gas for people.
You know that Jackie.
Teresa
Look, bush-face, if you call me Jackie again
I am going to call George Soros again, and withdraw
every million I have invested in the oil hedge fund.
JFK
I love it when you are sassy. It makes me get warmth in
my blood. Now what about the foreign currency funds? Are you and George keeping an eye on that? It won’t take much to completely crash the US economy, and our investments in foreign currencies will be worth fortunes. More than the Kennedy’s. Finally!
Teresa
You just keep that long-faced head of yours focused
on getting us into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. My son
is destined to be the President and I need you to keep the way paved for him.
JFK
I thought that you wanted it for us, for me?
Teresa
Let’s be clear. Your Democrat liberal politics
make me sick. Your liberal friends are all freaks.
your “war hero” status has been completely debunked.
On your own you don’t have anything and you have not
accomplished anything.
JFK (interrupting)
Not fair, Jackie!
Teresa
…….. DON’T interrupt me! You have one last
chance to be of any value to me. If you fail on
November 2nd, you have no value to me, or to
George or to anyone. You might as well assassinate
yourself, so you can make your final dream for glory come true.
JFK
Shut up Jackie, you are dangerously close to
taking a ride with Ted to the Chappaquiddick.
Teresa runs toward JFK, leaps and lunges at him, landing squarely on his upper thighs. She is pounding him like a piece of meat being tenderized.
Teresa
Where is that little shrapnel?
JFK
Stop, you are hurting the rice kernel on my leg.
Ok, ok, I promise I will win.
Stopping her attack
Teresa
How can you be sure? How can you guarantee
me that all of the time and money I have invested
in you so that I can secure my son’s Presidency has
not been in vain.
JFK
Easy, easy Jackie. We will do it the old fashioned
Kennedy, Clinton machine way – CHEAT!
The End
written and created by:Susan Kay Moses
a.k.a. Grandma Moses
JFK
What are you looking at Jackie?
Teresa
I wish that you would not call me that.
JFK
Ok, what are you looking at my precious?
Teresa
I’m feeling old, John, I think I need to see a doctor.
JFK
Sure, sure, I’ll call little John and get the name of
a good OGBYN.
Teresa
You mean OBGYN?
JFK
Yes, that’s what I said, OGBYN.
Teresa
John, you clearly said, OGBYN.
JFK
I might have misspoken about what I
said but I know that everyone knows
what I meant to say. So if I say OGBYN
or OBGYN it all means that same thing.
Teresa
Flip flopper
JFK
Jackie, let’s change the topic. I am hungry.
Teresa
How about a nice bowl of fruit loopholes. There are only a few left and you could get rid of them right now before
you are elected.
JFK
What are you talking about?
Teresa
Loopholes. You talk about them all of
the time and how you are going to get rid of them.
JFK
Never mind. Did you talk to George today?
Teresa
Yes.
JFK
And?
Teresa
And what, John?
JFK
Are the rising oil prices secure through November?
Will his hedge fund people keep the pressure
on? I can’t afford to have cheap gas for people.
You know that Jackie.
Teresa
Look, bush-face, if you call me Jackie again
I am going to call George Soros again, and withdraw
every million I have invested in the oil hedge fund.
JFK
I love it when you are sassy. It makes me get warmth in
my blood. Now what about the foreign currency funds? Are you and George keeping an eye on that? It won’t take much to completely crash the US economy, and our investments in foreign currencies will be worth fortunes. More than the Kennedy’s. Finally!
Teresa
You just keep that long-faced head of yours focused
on getting us into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. My son
is destined to be the President and I need you to keep the way paved for him.
JFK
I thought that you wanted it for us, for me?
Teresa
Let’s be clear. Your Democrat liberal politics
make me sick. Your liberal friends are all freaks.
your “war hero” status has been completely debunked.
On your own you don’t have anything and you have not
accomplished anything.
JFK (interrupting)
Not fair, Jackie!
Teresa
…….. DON’T interrupt me! You have one last
chance to be of any value to me. If you fail on
November 2nd, you have no value to me, or to
George or to anyone. You might as well assassinate
yourself, so you can make your final dream for glory come true.
JFK
Shut up Jackie, you are dangerously close to
taking a ride with Ted to the Chappaquiddick.
Teresa runs toward JFK, leaps and lunges at him, landing squarely on his upper thighs. She is pounding him like a piece of meat being tenderized.
Teresa
Where is that little shrapnel?
JFK
Stop, you are hurting the rice kernel on my leg.
Ok, ok, I promise I will win.
Stopping her attack
Teresa
How can you be sure? How can you guarantee
me that all of the time and money I have invested
in you so that I can secure my son’s Presidency has
not been in vain.
JFK
Easy, easy Jackie. We will do it the old fashioned
Kennedy, Clinton machine way – CHEAT!
The End
written and created by:Susan Kay Moses
a.k.a. Grandma Moses
Wednesday, October 06, 2004
10/06/04 - Post Debate - O
Is Dick Cheney a liability for President Bush? Yes, if one considers the possibility that George Bush does not wish to be re-elected.
During tonight's debate, Sen. Edwards looked like a self indulgent, spoiled, adolescent. He was out leagued, out classed and outted in general as a fraud.
I live in Beverly Hills, I have worked in entertainment for over 20 years and I am disgusted by the lack of focus, the lack of integrity, and the lack of fair play that the Kerry camp and the media have displayed during this election year. I am ashamed of the media thugs like Michael Moore and Dan Rather. They are not credible and they do not represent decent, mainstream, concerned Americans. They certainly do not represent me.
When Sen. Edwards stated on ABC's Nightline that any person living in America who would vote for George Bush must be out of their mind, I was shocked. Consider that somewhere between 45-55% of Americans fall into that category. Edwards single-handedly insulted approximately 50% of the American people. His reckless statement reinforces a negative image of Americans around the world.
His careless statement is reminiscent of Michael Moore's rhetoric while touring Europe on behalf of his little movie. Trashing the American spirit, free speech and free choice is not a quality requisite for successful foreign policies or domestic harmony. Vice President Cheney displayed a sense of self restraint and diplomacy that amplified Sen. Edwards' lack of seasoning and minimal experience.
I don't need a poll to determine my mindset for November 2nd, 2004. I want a secure America, and a strong economy. I do believe that we did the right thing by going into Iraq prior to taking on the additional challenges of other terrorist sponsoring nations. War is bad and it comes with a menu of difficult consequences. The alternative to invading Iraq is not one I wish to experience. The potential costs to Americans of not going to war far outweigh the costs of being there. Failure to recognize the realities of today's geopolitical arena is a byproduct of poor media communications and a lack of willingness on the part of some people to accept the fact that Americans are targets because we are free. Freedom is the target.
I know that hair matters and style is key, but a tan in a can and hair to go will not keep a terrorist from bombing a school or a dam or a subway ..... Sen. Edwards can save his slick wily style for the jury box closing statement. Americans are not buying his cotton candy and they don't trust John Kerry's duplicitous standards and his positions of convenience. I support George Bush and Dick Cheney because I believe that they will remain resolved to keeping our enemy at checkmate and eventually to eliminating him wherever he is no matter what it takes. The sacrifice is great, but there is no other viable option if we are to remain free.
During tonight's debate, Sen. Edwards looked like a self indulgent, spoiled, adolescent. He was out leagued, out classed and outted in general as a fraud.
I live in Beverly Hills, I have worked in entertainment for over 20 years and I am disgusted by the lack of focus, the lack of integrity, and the lack of fair play that the Kerry camp and the media have displayed during this election year. I am ashamed of the media thugs like Michael Moore and Dan Rather. They are not credible and they do not represent decent, mainstream, concerned Americans. They certainly do not represent me.
When Sen. Edwards stated on ABC's Nightline that any person living in America who would vote for George Bush must be out of their mind, I was shocked. Consider that somewhere between 45-55% of Americans fall into that category. Edwards single-handedly insulted approximately 50% of the American people. His reckless statement reinforces a negative image of Americans around the world.
His careless statement is reminiscent of Michael Moore's rhetoric while touring Europe on behalf of his little movie. Trashing the American spirit, free speech and free choice is not a quality requisite for successful foreign policies or domestic harmony. Vice President Cheney displayed a sense of self restraint and diplomacy that amplified Sen. Edwards' lack of seasoning and minimal experience.
I don't need a poll to determine my mindset for November 2nd, 2004. I want a secure America, and a strong economy. I do believe that we did the right thing by going into Iraq prior to taking on the additional challenges of other terrorist sponsoring nations. War is bad and it comes with a menu of difficult consequences. The alternative to invading Iraq is not one I wish to experience. The potential costs to Americans of not going to war far outweigh the costs of being there. Failure to recognize the realities of today's geopolitical arena is a byproduct of poor media communications and a lack of willingness on the part of some people to accept the fact that Americans are targets because we are free. Freedom is the target.
I know that hair matters and style is key, but a tan in a can and hair to go will not keep a terrorist from bombing a school or a dam or a subway ..... Sen. Edwards can save his slick wily style for the jury box closing statement. Americans are not buying his cotton candy and they don't trust John Kerry's duplicitous standards and his positions of convenience. I support George Bush and Dick Cheney because I believe that they will remain resolved to keeping our enemy at checkmate and eventually to eliminating him wherever he is no matter what it takes. The sacrifice is great, but there is no other viable option if we are to remain free.
Thursday, September 02, 2004
Michael Moore Wannabe Warrior - O
September 1st, 2004 10:14 pm
Michael Moore Wannabe Warrior – by Susan Moses
In response to Michael Moore in / USA Today
BEVERLY HILLS, CA — Poor Michael Moore.
Here's a guy people could sort of like, in the same way one could observe the curious and amusing behavior of a barnyard goat. He is not a courageous war hero, or bright or even interesting, but he seems to enjoy having been reduced to carrying a bedpan for the Kerry campaign.
So it was Monday night as the barnyard creature waddled into the press section at the Republican National Convention— unimportant to Sen. McCain — Moore was awestruck as the Senator seamlessly switched from the delivery of his eloquent speech to a pointed commentary about Moore’s disingenuousness. By Moore’s whimpering account, “Out of nowhere, he (McCain) began to attack my movie, Fahrenheit 9/11, calling me a disingenuous filmmaker. The problem is, he hasn't seen the movie, a fact he later admitted to Chris Matthews on MSNBC.” Of course Senator McCain has not seen Moore’s film. It is remarkable that Moore would find that information anomalous.
The barnyard idiot thinks that Republicans are mad that his little movie may have convinced people to tip the balance in November. Moore’s claim that Saddam's Iraq was an "oasis of peace" has certainly tipped the balance as demonstrated within the last week by the extremists in Russia, Jerusalem and his new second home, France. Some of the 20 million who have allegedly seen his “thing called film” must be celebrating the truths about terrorism revealed by Moore in contrast to the actual events unfolding around the world.
Yet with all the serious issues facing our nation, Moore would rather write about Goobers, a mosh pit at a Slayer concert and Beavis and Butthead. He would focus on the faces of Iraqi people fearing their death, but not at the hands of the man who persecuted them. No, Moore has rewritten history to spur his bank account. He believes that portraying revisionist history on video is a documentary and apparently there are millions of unfortunates who would follow him and newspapers ready to champion him in print. Even more pedantic than his “thing called film” are his attempts at the written word. Middle school boys scribbling notes from summer camp are better equipped.
Senator McCain stood solidly on the stage as he addressed his audience. While Michael Moore would prefer to wallow in a cesspit of negativity, America honors Senator McCain for his service and the sacrifice he made during his five and a half years in a North Vietnamese POW camp. If there is any question of sanity the world must turn to Michael Moore just as the convention audience did on Monday night.
In response to Senator McCains comments about Moore's rediculous movie, thousands of Republicans, Democrats and Independents turned to him chanting "four more years." Obviously failing at simple math, Moore held up two fingers, uttered some gibberish and made the “L” sign with his hand. His pathetic display drove the delegates and invited guests into a frenzy of laughter at the antics of the misfit. "L" is the international sign for loser. Moore must be the only remaining person not to have realized that he has become the biggest loser. After he left the convention floor, he cried, “If you have never had this happen to you, I insist you try it at least once in your life.”
The fact that Senator McCain has elected to stand proudly with the President, offering to soldier with him, is a difficult fact for Moore to digest, and there are not many things that the barnyard goat will not digest. Michael Moore wants to devour everyone who does not abide by his brand of anti-American speechifying. The problem with him is that he turns any good thing into crap. He leaves a trail of it behind him as he carries on the bidding of the Democratic Party, George Soros and Moveon.org.
How does Bush's campaign treat Michael Moore? Like it or not he is a citizen of this great nation. He enjoys free speech, and the ability to move freely in and out of the convention hall. He is limited in his actions only by the law. No one within the President’s campaign demanded that his film be censured, pulled from theatres or limited in any way. Chris Matthews said a main point of Moore’s movie was that "war is often fought by people without power." Perhaps the point of the “thing called film” is actually the filmmaker’s self-reflection.
Michael Moore is a powerless, pointless individual who does battle in his own imaginary war each day to stay alive beyond his fading fifteen minutes of fame. One day he will see brave soldiers face another camera and tell the truth to the American people about what is going on in a place called Iraq. On that day he and Senator Kerry can compare notes on the net result of revisionist history. Agghh!
Michael Moore Wannabe Warrior – by Susan Moses
In response to Michael Moore in / USA Today
BEVERLY HILLS, CA — Poor Michael Moore.
Here's a guy people could sort of like, in the same way one could observe the curious and amusing behavior of a barnyard goat. He is not a courageous war hero, or bright or even interesting, but he seems to enjoy having been reduced to carrying a bedpan for the Kerry campaign.
So it was Monday night as the barnyard creature waddled into the press section at the Republican National Convention— unimportant to Sen. McCain — Moore was awestruck as the Senator seamlessly switched from the delivery of his eloquent speech to a pointed commentary about Moore’s disingenuousness. By Moore’s whimpering account, “Out of nowhere, he (McCain) began to attack my movie, Fahrenheit 9/11, calling me a disingenuous filmmaker. The problem is, he hasn't seen the movie, a fact he later admitted to Chris Matthews on MSNBC.” Of course Senator McCain has not seen Moore’s film. It is remarkable that Moore would find that information anomalous.
The barnyard idiot thinks that Republicans are mad that his little movie may have convinced people to tip the balance in November. Moore’s claim that Saddam's Iraq was an "oasis of peace" has certainly tipped the balance as demonstrated within the last week by the extremists in Russia, Jerusalem and his new second home, France. Some of the 20 million who have allegedly seen his “thing called film” must be celebrating the truths about terrorism revealed by Moore in contrast to the actual events unfolding around the world.
Yet with all the serious issues facing our nation, Moore would rather write about Goobers, a mosh pit at a Slayer concert and Beavis and Butthead. He would focus on the faces of Iraqi people fearing their death, but not at the hands of the man who persecuted them. No, Moore has rewritten history to spur his bank account. He believes that portraying revisionist history on video is a documentary and apparently there are millions of unfortunates who would follow him and newspapers ready to champion him in print. Even more pedantic than his “thing called film” are his attempts at the written word. Middle school boys scribbling notes from summer camp are better equipped.
Senator McCain stood solidly on the stage as he addressed his audience. While Michael Moore would prefer to wallow in a cesspit of negativity, America honors Senator McCain for his service and the sacrifice he made during his five and a half years in a North Vietnamese POW camp. If there is any question of sanity the world must turn to Michael Moore just as the convention audience did on Monday night.
In response to Senator McCains comments about Moore's rediculous movie, thousands of Republicans, Democrats and Independents turned to him chanting "four more years." Obviously failing at simple math, Moore held up two fingers, uttered some gibberish and made the “L” sign with his hand. His pathetic display drove the delegates and invited guests into a frenzy of laughter at the antics of the misfit. "L" is the international sign for loser. Moore must be the only remaining person not to have realized that he has become the biggest loser. After he left the convention floor, he cried, “If you have never had this happen to you, I insist you try it at least once in your life.”
The fact that Senator McCain has elected to stand proudly with the President, offering to soldier with him, is a difficult fact for Moore to digest, and there are not many things that the barnyard goat will not digest. Michael Moore wants to devour everyone who does not abide by his brand of anti-American speechifying. The problem with him is that he turns any good thing into crap. He leaves a trail of it behind him as he carries on the bidding of the Democratic Party, George Soros and Moveon.org.
How does Bush's campaign treat Michael Moore? Like it or not he is a citizen of this great nation. He enjoys free speech, and the ability to move freely in and out of the convention hall. He is limited in his actions only by the law. No one within the President’s campaign demanded that his film be censured, pulled from theatres or limited in any way. Chris Matthews said a main point of Moore’s movie was that "war is often fought by people without power." Perhaps the point of the “thing called film” is actually the filmmaker’s self-reflection.
Michael Moore is a powerless, pointless individual who does battle in his own imaginary war each day to stay alive beyond his fading fifteen minutes of fame. One day he will see brave soldiers face another camera and tell the truth to the American people about what is going on in a place called Iraq. On that day he and Senator Kerry can compare notes on the net result of revisionist history. Agghh!
Sunday, August 29, 2004
Moore on 527s - O
Has anyone examined and exposed the connection between Michael Moore, the 527s, the Kerry Campaign, the Democratic party, the Clintons, Soros and other people within the Kerry web?
He attends 527 fund raisers, he sat next to Jimmy Carter at the DNC, he flaunts his Hollywood connections, all of whom hate President Bush and now he has a press credential from USA Today to attend the RNC.
Someone needs to remind him that while he is pointing his fat finger at George Bush, four are pointing back at him.
He attends 527 fund raisers, he sat next to Jimmy Carter at the DNC, he flaunts his Hollywood connections, all of whom hate President Bush and now he has a press credential from USA Today to attend the RNC.
Someone needs to remind him that while he is pointing his fat finger at George Bush, four are pointing back at him.
Michael Moore's Open Letter to the President
August 26, 2004
It Takes Real Courage to Desert Your Post and Then Attack a Wounded Vet
Dear Mr. Bush,
I know you and I have had our differences in the past, and I realize I am the one who started this whole mess about "who did what" during Vietnam when I brought up that "deserter" nonsense back in January. But I have to hand it to you on what you have uncovered about John Kerry and his record in Vietnam. Kerry has tried to pass himself off as a war hero, but thanks to you and your friends, we now know the truth.
First of all, thank you for pointing out to all of us that Mr. Kerry was never struck by a BULLET. It was only SHRAPNEL that entered his body! I did not know that! Hell, what's the big deal about a bunch of large, sharp, metal shards ripping open your flesh? That happens to all of us! In my opinion, if you want a purple heart, you'd better be hit by a bullet -- with your name on it!
Secondly, thank you for sending Bob Dole out there and letting us know that Mr. Kerry, though wounded three times, actually "never spilled blood." When you are in the debates with Kerry, turn to him and say, "Dammit, Mr. Kerry, next time you want a purple heart, you better spill some American red blood! And I don't mean a few specks like those on O.J.'s socks -- we want to see a good pint or two of blood for each medal. In fact, I would have preferred that you had bled profusely, a big geyser of blood spewing out of your neck or something!" Then throw this one at him: "Senator Kerry, over 58,000 brave Americans gave their lives in Vietnam -- but YOU didn't. You only got WOUNDED! What do you have to say for yourself???" Lay that one on him and he won't know what to do.
And thanks, also, Mr. Bush, for exposing the fact that Mr. Kerry might have actually WOUNDED HIMSELF in order to get those shiny medals. Of course he did! How could the Viet Cong have hit him -- he was on a SWIFT boat! He was going too fast to be hit by enemy fire. He tried to blow himself up three different times just so he could go home and run for president someday. It's all so easy to see, now, what he was up to.
What would we do without you, Mr. Bush? Criticize you as we might, when it comes to pointing out other men's military records, there is no one who can touch your prowess. In 2000, you let out the rumor that your opponent John McCain might be "nuts" from the 5 years he spent in a POW camp. Then, in the 2002 elections, your team compared triple-amputee Sen. Max Cleland to Osama bin Laden, and that cost him the election. And now you are having the same impact on war hero John Kerry. Since you (oops, I mean "The Swift Boat Veterans for Truth!") started running those ads, Kerry's poll numbers have dropped (with veterans, he has lost 18 points in the last few weeks).
Some people have said "Who are you, Mr. Bush, to attack these brave men considering you yourself have never seen combat -- in fact, you actively sought to avoid it." What your critics fail to understand is that even though your dad got you into a unit that would never be sent to Vietnam -- and even though you didn't show up for Guard duty for at least a year -- at least you were still IN FAVOR of the Vietnam War! Cowards like Clinton felt it was more important to be consistent (he opposed the war, thus he refused to go) than to be patriotic and two-faced.
The reason that I think you know so much about other men's war wounds is because, during your time in the Texas Air National Guard, you suffered so many of them yourself. Consider the paper cut you received on September 22, 1972, while stationed in Alabama, working on a Senate campaign for your dad's friend (when you were supposed to be on the Guard base). A campaign brochure appeared from nowhere, ambushing your right index finger, and blood trickled out onto your brand new argyle sweater.
Then there was the incident with the Crazy Glue when your fraternity brothers visited you one weekend at the base and glued your lips together while you were "passed out." Though initially considered "friendly fire," it was later ruled that you suffered severe post traumatic stress disorder from the assault and required certain medicinal attention -- which, it seems, was provided by those same fraternity brethren.
But nothing matched your heroism when, on July 2, 1969, you sustained a massive head injury when enemy combatants from another Guard unit dropped a keg of Coors on your head during a reconnaissance mission at a nearby all-girls college. Fortunately, the cool, smooth fluids that poured out of the keg were exactly what was needed to revive you.
That you never got a purple heart for any of these incidents is a shame. I can fully appreciate your anger at Senator Kerry for the three he received. I mean, Kerry was a man of privilege, he could have gotten out just like you. Instead, he thinks he's going to gain points with the American people bragging about how he was getting shot at every day in the Mekong Delta. Ha! Is that the best he can do? Hell, I hear gunfire every night outside my apartment window! If he thinks he is going to impress anyone with the fact that he volunteered to go when he could have spent the Vietnam years on the family yacht, he should think again. That only shows how stupid he was! True-blue Americans want a president who knows how to pull strings and work the system and get away with doing as little work as possible!
So, to make it up to you, I have written some new ads you can use on TV. People will soon tire of the swift boat veterans and you are going to need some fresh, punchier material. Feel free to use any of these:
ANNOUNCER: "When the bullets were flying all around him in Vietnam, what did John Kerry do? He said he leaned over the boat and 'pulled a man out of the river.' But, as we all know, men don't live in the river -- fish do. John Kerry knows how to tell a big fish tale. What he won't tell you is that when the enemy was shooting at him, he ducked. Do you want a president who will duck? Vote Bush."
ANNOUNCER: "Mr. Kerry's biggest supporter, Sen. Max Cleland, claims to have lost two legs and an arm in Vietnam. But he still has one arm! How did that happen? One word: Cowardice. When duty called, he was unwilling to give his last limb. Is that the type of selfishness you want hanging out in the White House? We think not. Vote for the man who would be willing to give America his right frontal lobe. Vote Bush."
Hope these help, Mr. Bush. And remember, when the American death toll in Iraq hits 1,000 during the Republican convention, be sure to question whether those who died really did indeed "die" -- or were they just trying to get their faces on CNN's nightly tribute to fallen heroes? The sixteen who've died so far this week were probably working hand in hand with the Kerry campaign to ruin your good time in New York. Stay consistent, sir, and always, ALWAYS question the veracity of anyone who risks their life for this country. It's the least they deserve.
Yours,
Michael Moore
mmflint@aol.com
www.michaelmoore.com
P.S. George, I know you said you don't read the newspaper, but USA Today has given me credentials to the Republican convention to write a guest column each day next week (Tues.-Fri.). If you don't want to read it, you and I will be in the same building so maybe I could come by and read it to you? Lemme know...
It Takes Real Courage to Desert Your Post and Then Attack a Wounded Vet
Dear Mr. Bush,
I know you and I have had our differences in the past, and I realize I am the one who started this whole mess about "who did what" during Vietnam when I brought up that "deserter" nonsense back in January. But I have to hand it to you on what you have uncovered about John Kerry and his record in Vietnam. Kerry has tried to pass himself off as a war hero, but thanks to you and your friends, we now know the truth.
First of all, thank you for pointing out to all of us that Mr. Kerry was never struck by a BULLET. It was only SHRAPNEL that entered his body! I did not know that! Hell, what's the big deal about a bunch of large, sharp, metal shards ripping open your flesh? That happens to all of us! In my opinion, if you want a purple heart, you'd better be hit by a bullet -- with your name on it!
Secondly, thank you for sending Bob Dole out there and letting us know that Mr. Kerry, though wounded three times, actually "never spilled blood." When you are in the debates with Kerry, turn to him and say, "Dammit, Mr. Kerry, next time you want a purple heart, you better spill some American red blood! And I don't mean a few specks like those on O.J.'s socks -- we want to see a good pint or two of blood for each medal. In fact, I would have preferred that you had bled profusely, a big geyser of blood spewing out of your neck or something!" Then throw this one at him: "Senator Kerry, over 58,000 brave Americans gave their lives in Vietnam -- but YOU didn't. You only got WOUNDED! What do you have to say for yourself???" Lay that one on him and he won't know what to do.
And thanks, also, Mr. Bush, for exposing the fact that Mr. Kerry might have actually WOUNDED HIMSELF in order to get those shiny medals. Of course he did! How could the Viet Cong have hit him -- he was on a SWIFT boat! He was going too fast to be hit by enemy fire. He tried to blow himself up three different times just so he could go home and run for president someday. It's all so easy to see, now, what he was up to.
What would we do without you, Mr. Bush? Criticize you as we might, when it comes to pointing out other men's military records, there is no one who can touch your prowess. In 2000, you let out the rumor that your opponent John McCain might be "nuts" from the 5 years he spent in a POW camp. Then, in the 2002 elections, your team compared triple-amputee Sen. Max Cleland to Osama bin Laden, and that cost him the election. And now you are having the same impact on war hero John Kerry. Since you (oops, I mean "The Swift Boat Veterans for Truth!") started running those ads, Kerry's poll numbers have dropped (with veterans, he has lost 18 points in the last few weeks).
Some people have said "Who are you, Mr. Bush, to attack these brave men considering you yourself have never seen combat -- in fact, you actively sought to avoid it." What your critics fail to understand is that even though your dad got you into a unit that would never be sent to Vietnam -- and even though you didn't show up for Guard duty for at least a year -- at least you were still IN FAVOR of the Vietnam War! Cowards like Clinton felt it was more important to be consistent (he opposed the war, thus he refused to go) than to be patriotic and two-faced.
The reason that I think you know so much about other men's war wounds is because, during your time in the Texas Air National Guard, you suffered so many of them yourself. Consider the paper cut you received on September 22, 1972, while stationed in Alabama, working on a Senate campaign for your dad's friend (when you were supposed to be on the Guard base). A campaign brochure appeared from nowhere, ambushing your right index finger, and blood trickled out onto your brand new argyle sweater.
Then there was the incident with the Crazy Glue when your fraternity brothers visited you one weekend at the base and glued your lips together while you were "passed out." Though initially considered "friendly fire," it was later ruled that you suffered severe post traumatic stress disorder from the assault and required certain medicinal attention -- which, it seems, was provided by those same fraternity brethren.
But nothing matched your heroism when, on July 2, 1969, you sustained a massive head injury when enemy combatants from another Guard unit dropped a keg of Coors on your head during a reconnaissance mission at a nearby all-girls college. Fortunately, the cool, smooth fluids that poured out of the keg were exactly what was needed to revive you.
That you never got a purple heart for any of these incidents is a shame. I can fully appreciate your anger at Senator Kerry for the three he received. I mean, Kerry was a man of privilege, he could have gotten out just like you. Instead, he thinks he's going to gain points with the American people bragging about how he was getting shot at every day in the Mekong Delta. Ha! Is that the best he can do? Hell, I hear gunfire every night outside my apartment window! If he thinks he is going to impress anyone with the fact that he volunteered to go when he could have spent the Vietnam years on the family yacht, he should think again. That only shows how stupid he was! True-blue Americans want a president who knows how to pull strings and work the system and get away with doing as little work as possible!
So, to make it up to you, I have written some new ads you can use on TV. People will soon tire of the swift boat veterans and you are going to need some fresh, punchier material. Feel free to use any of these:
ANNOUNCER: "When the bullets were flying all around him in Vietnam, what did John Kerry do? He said he leaned over the boat and 'pulled a man out of the river.' But, as we all know, men don't live in the river -- fish do. John Kerry knows how to tell a big fish tale. What he won't tell you is that when the enemy was shooting at him, he ducked. Do you want a president who will duck? Vote Bush."
ANNOUNCER: "Mr. Kerry's biggest supporter, Sen. Max Cleland, claims to have lost two legs and an arm in Vietnam. But he still has one arm! How did that happen? One word: Cowardice. When duty called, he was unwilling to give his last limb. Is that the type of selfishness you want hanging out in the White House? We think not. Vote for the man who would be willing to give America his right frontal lobe. Vote Bush."
Hope these help, Mr. Bush. And remember, when the American death toll in Iraq hits 1,000 during the Republican convention, be sure to question whether those who died really did indeed "die" -- or were they just trying to get their faces on CNN's nightly tribute to fallen heroes? The sixteen who've died so far this week were probably working hand in hand with the Kerry campaign to ruin your good time in New York. Stay consistent, sir, and always, ALWAYS question the veracity of anyone who risks their life for this country. It's the least they deserve.
Yours,
Michael Moore
mmflint@aol.com
www.michaelmoore.com
P.S. George, I know you said you don't read the newspaper, but USA Today has given me credentials to the Republican convention to write a guest column each day next week (Tues.-Fri.). If you don't want to read it, you and I will be in the same building so maybe I could come by and read it to you? Lemme know...
Response to Moore's Letter to the President - O
It Takes No Courage to Sell Your Soul and Then Demean All Veterans
Dear Mr. Moore:
You have made your differences with conservative America and the Bush administration quite apparent. Your laughable attempts at filmmaking have reflected not only your modest intellectual capacity; they would be an embarrassing addition to a legitimate filmography. You alone appear to be unaware that the joke, the valid and final laugh, is actually on you. The Kerry campaign, George Soros, the Clintons, Moveon.org, and many other fringe groups saw you coming long before you knew the meaning of the word pawn. Buying you was the cheapest (how fitting) second hand, thrift shop purchase the card-carrying members of Hollywood could have made. If you believe that behind closed doors, you are actually an icon inside the inner circle, grow up. For the time being, everyone is having far more fun laughing at you. You cannot possibly believe that you have any long term or meaningful value. Within compassionate circles of the entertainment community, people vacillate between laughing at you and feeling sorry for you because you do not possess the academic capacity to digest how pitiable and disposable you are.
Over 2.5 million people served in Vietnam. There are bets on the table that you could not locate it on a world map. Please do not flatter yourself; Vietnam War veterans could never be represented by your factitious claims that you “started this whole mess about who did what during Vietnam when you brought up that "deserter" nonsense back in January.”
You may want to hand it to President Bush, and claim that he uncovered irregularities in Senator John F. Kerry’s military record. Unlike you, President Bush is a man of great integrity. Unlike you and, now it seems Senator Kerry, George Bush, would never claim another man’s glory or valor. Senator John F. Kerry, tried to pass himself off as a war hero, but thanks to you and your friends, we now know the truth. The truth is that you are apparently the missing link between the Kerry Campaign, the Democratic Party, the 527 PACs supporting Senator Kerry and the misguided, undereducated, misfits who buy into your unintelligible rhetoric.
Your quantum leap of understanding the differences between a BULLET and SHRAPNEL would make a great comic strip. What on earth could you possibly know about shrapnel? I have to hand it to you now, because obviously you have seen Senator John F. Kerry’s wound. Your description of the large, sharp, metal shards ripping open his flesh is something that has not been made public. Thank you for sharing the intimate details of your private life and relationship with Senator John. F. Kerry. It has been duly noted.
Secondly, what point were you attempting to make by questioning the comments Bob Dole directed at Mr. Kerry? Yes, it does happen to be true that though, Sen. Kerry claims that he was wounded three times, he actually "never spilled blood." Perhaps you need to revisit your own statement, and I quote you here, "Dammit, Mr. Kerry, next time you want a purple heart, you better spill some American red blood! And I don't mean a few specks like those on O.J.'s socks -- we want to see a good pint or two of blood for each medal. In fact, I would have preferred that you had bled profusely, a big geyser of blood spewing out of your neck or something!"
Do you believe that your bold faced audacity would be of great comfort to the families of the over 58,000 brave Americans who gave their lives in Vietnam? You have never been WOUNDED! What could you possibly know about wounds, war or service? What do you have to say for yourself?
And thanks, also, for confirming, and I quote you here, “the fact that Mr. Kerry might have actually WOUNDED HIMSELF in order to get those shiny medals. Of course he did! How could the Viet Cong have hit him -- he was on a SWIFT boat! He was going too fast to be hit by enemy fire. He tried to blow himself up three different times just so he could go home and run for President someday. It's all so easy to see, now, what he was up to.”
What would we do without you, Mr. Moore? Criticize you and laugh at you as we do, when it comes to pointing out other men's military records, there is no one who can touch your prowess. Even "The Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” who without your assistance; single-handedly organized, funded and started running those ads, could not have anticipated how Kerry's poll numbers would crash. True within the veteran’s groups, Sen. Kerry has lost 18 points in the last few weeks. What is it about that simple logic that escapes you?
Some people have said "Who are you, Mr. Bush, to attack these brave men considering you yourself have never seen combat -- in fact, you actively sought to avoid it." Mr. Moore, reasonable, decent, educated, accomplished people consider the source when ridiculous statements are made. Please refrain from talking about things you unfortunately could never digest. When you do, your actions merely become more fader for our laughter.
What you fail to understand is that the President’s father did not get him into a unit that would never be sent to Vietnam. President Bush’s Guard duty records have proven his service and very “honorable discharge”. Show us Sen. Kerry's original discharge. Honorable, or counterfeited like his service records signed by John Lehman. I agree with you that cowards like Clinton justify their actions by claiming to be consistent. He and others opposed the war, refused to go, thus making overt statements about their lack of patriotism. Thank you for pointing out that fact.
I can fully appreciate your frustration over Senator Kerry’s claims surrounding the medals he received. Kerry was a man of privilege; he tried to get a deferment so that he could study in Paris. When that failed he concocted his scheme. He joined the Navy, made a very quick turnaround trip to Vietnam and returned to gain points with the American people bragging about how he was getting shot at every day in the Mekong Delta. Ha! Is that the best he could do? If he thinks he is going to impress anyone with the fact that he volunteered to go when he could have spent the Vietnam years on the family yacht, he should think again. That only shows how stupid he was!
True-blue Americans want a President who is honest, and holds integrity in the highest esteem. Not one who knows how to pull strings and work the system and get away with phony claims of heroism and valor. Americans do understand the true character of George W. Bush, and they recognize the genesis of the fantasy life being portrayed by John F. Kerry.
So, to make it up to you, I have written an ad you can produce for all of your friends at Moveon.org and for George Soros personally. People will soon tire of John Kerry’s empty statements, ugly past and hopeless efforts to claim 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue as home. You are going to need some fresh, punchier material. Feel free to use mine:
ANNOUNCER: "When the water bugs were flying all around him in Vietnam, what did John Kerry do? He tried to feed them pieces of the rice he was removing from the self-inflicted wounds to his buttocks. When the bugs refused to eat his butt rice, he Ordered his boat crew to make a swift exit from the area! When he noticed that his Order caused one of his crew to fall out of the boat, he reluctantly returned and 'ordered the man out of the river.' But, as we all know, men don't live in the river -- fish do. John Kerry knows how to tell a big fish tale. What he won't tell you is that when the bugs were landing on his neck, he ducked. If you want a president who will duck out, vote Kerry!
Your references to Max Clelend are cheap and do not merit any response. The veteran communities will be able to offer their response to your despicable use of one of their own to create a platform for your sophomoric attempts to correspond with the President of the United States.
Remember, if the American death toll in Iraq hits 1,000, you need to think about the souls of each one lost and the families morning them, because they, unlike you, Bill Clinton and your love interest, John Kerry, have what it takes to fight a war abroad so that we do not have to fight for our lives at home. Stay consistent, sir, and always, ALWAYS question the veracity of anyone who risks their life for this country. It's what we have come to expect from you.
Sincerely
Susan Moses
P.S. Bravo on receiving the USA Today press credentials to the Republican convention to write a guest column each day next week (Tues.-Fri.). My new puppy will know exactly what to do on every word you attempt to string together.
Dear Mr. Moore:
You have made your differences with conservative America and the Bush administration quite apparent. Your laughable attempts at filmmaking have reflected not only your modest intellectual capacity; they would be an embarrassing addition to a legitimate filmography. You alone appear to be unaware that the joke, the valid and final laugh, is actually on you. The Kerry campaign, George Soros, the Clintons, Moveon.org, and many other fringe groups saw you coming long before you knew the meaning of the word pawn. Buying you was the cheapest (how fitting) second hand, thrift shop purchase the card-carrying members of Hollywood could have made. If you believe that behind closed doors, you are actually an icon inside the inner circle, grow up. For the time being, everyone is having far more fun laughing at you. You cannot possibly believe that you have any long term or meaningful value. Within compassionate circles of the entertainment community, people vacillate between laughing at you and feeling sorry for you because you do not possess the academic capacity to digest how pitiable and disposable you are.
Over 2.5 million people served in Vietnam. There are bets on the table that you could not locate it on a world map. Please do not flatter yourself; Vietnam War veterans could never be represented by your factitious claims that you “started this whole mess about who did what during Vietnam when you brought up that "deserter" nonsense back in January.”
You may want to hand it to President Bush, and claim that he uncovered irregularities in Senator John F. Kerry’s military record. Unlike you, President Bush is a man of great integrity. Unlike you and, now it seems Senator Kerry, George Bush, would never claim another man’s glory or valor. Senator John F. Kerry, tried to pass himself off as a war hero, but thanks to you and your friends, we now know the truth. The truth is that you are apparently the missing link between the Kerry Campaign, the Democratic Party, the 527 PACs supporting Senator Kerry and the misguided, undereducated, misfits who buy into your unintelligible rhetoric.
Your quantum leap of understanding the differences between a BULLET and SHRAPNEL would make a great comic strip. What on earth could you possibly know about shrapnel? I have to hand it to you now, because obviously you have seen Senator John F. Kerry’s wound. Your description of the large, sharp, metal shards ripping open his flesh is something that has not been made public. Thank you for sharing the intimate details of your private life and relationship with Senator John. F. Kerry. It has been duly noted.
Secondly, what point were you attempting to make by questioning the comments Bob Dole directed at Mr. Kerry? Yes, it does happen to be true that though, Sen. Kerry claims that he was wounded three times, he actually "never spilled blood." Perhaps you need to revisit your own statement, and I quote you here, "Dammit, Mr. Kerry, next time you want a purple heart, you better spill some American red blood! And I don't mean a few specks like those on O.J.'s socks -- we want to see a good pint or two of blood for each medal. In fact, I would have preferred that you had bled profusely, a big geyser of blood spewing out of your neck or something!"
Do you believe that your bold faced audacity would be of great comfort to the families of the over 58,000 brave Americans who gave their lives in Vietnam? You have never been WOUNDED! What could you possibly know about wounds, war or service? What do you have to say for yourself?
And thanks, also, for confirming, and I quote you here, “the fact that Mr. Kerry might have actually WOUNDED HIMSELF in order to get those shiny medals. Of course he did! How could the Viet Cong have hit him -- he was on a SWIFT boat! He was going too fast to be hit by enemy fire. He tried to blow himself up three different times just so he could go home and run for President someday. It's all so easy to see, now, what he was up to.”
What would we do without you, Mr. Moore? Criticize you and laugh at you as we do, when it comes to pointing out other men's military records, there is no one who can touch your prowess. Even "The Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” who without your assistance; single-handedly organized, funded and started running those ads, could not have anticipated how Kerry's poll numbers would crash. True within the veteran’s groups, Sen. Kerry has lost 18 points in the last few weeks. What is it about that simple logic that escapes you?
Some people have said "Who are you, Mr. Bush, to attack these brave men considering you yourself have never seen combat -- in fact, you actively sought to avoid it." Mr. Moore, reasonable, decent, educated, accomplished people consider the source when ridiculous statements are made. Please refrain from talking about things you unfortunately could never digest. When you do, your actions merely become more fader for our laughter.
What you fail to understand is that the President’s father did not get him into a unit that would never be sent to Vietnam. President Bush’s Guard duty records have proven his service and very “honorable discharge”. Show us Sen. Kerry's original discharge. Honorable, or counterfeited like his service records signed by John Lehman. I agree with you that cowards like Clinton justify their actions by claiming to be consistent. He and others opposed the war, refused to go, thus making overt statements about their lack of patriotism. Thank you for pointing out that fact.
I can fully appreciate your frustration over Senator Kerry’s claims surrounding the medals he received. Kerry was a man of privilege; he tried to get a deferment so that he could study in Paris. When that failed he concocted his scheme. He joined the Navy, made a very quick turnaround trip to Vietnam and returned to gain points with the American people bragging about how he was getting shot at every day in the Mekong Delta. Ha! Is that the best he could do? If he thinks he is going to impress anyone with the fact that he volunteered to go when he could have spent the Vietnam years on the family yacht, he should think again. That only shows how stupid he was!
True-blue Americans want a President who is honest, and holds integrity in the highest esteem. Not one who knows how to pull strings and work the system and get away with phony claims of heroism and valor. Americans do understand the true character of George W. Bush, and they recognize the genesis of the fantasy life being portrayed by John F. Kerry.
So, to make it up to you, I have written an ad you can produce for all of your friends at Moveon.org and for George Soros personally. People will soon tire of John Kerry’s empty statements, ugly past and hopeless efforts to claim 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue as home. You are going to need some fresh, punchier material. Feel free to use mine:
ANNOUNCER: "When the water bugs were flying all around him in Vietnam, what did John Kerry do? He tried to feed them pieces of the rice he was removing from the self-inflicted wounds to his buttocks. When the bugs refused to eat his butt rice, he Ordered his boat crew to make a swift exit from the area! When he noticed that his Order caused one of his crew to fall out of the boat, he reluctantly returned and 'ordered the man out of the river.' But, as we all know, men don't live in the river -- fish do. John Kerry knows how to tell a big fish tale. What he won't tell you is that when the bugs were landing on his neck, he ducked. If you want a president who will duck out, vote Kerry!
Your references to Max Clelend are cheap and do not merit any response. The veteran communities will be able to offer their response to your despicable use of one of their own to create a platform for your sophomoric attempts to correspond with the President of the United States.
Remember, if the American death toll in Iraq hits 1,000, you need to think about the souls of each one lost and the families morning them, because they, unlike you, Bill Clinton and your love interest, John Kerry, have what it takes to fight a war abroad so that we do not have to fight for our lives at home. Stay consistent, sir, and always, ALWAYS question the veracity of anyone who risks their life for this country. It's what we have come to expect from you.
Sincerely
Susan Moses
P.S. Bravo on receiving the USA Today press credentials to the Republican convention to write a guest column each day next week (Tues.-Fri.). My new puppy will know exactly what to do on every word you attempt to string together.
Friday, August 27, 2004
The Protestor Revisited - O
The Kerry campaign sent a letter today pleading for support, and calling for a stop to the challenges of the Senator's service record. The desperate tone supports the theory that the Demonrats are running scared.
They are extremely worried that Kerry's entire war record will be made public prior to Nov. 2nd.
Even if the Swifties stopped today - the rat is out of the bag, it smells bad and it is swimming down river from Cambodia and up the Chappaquidick.
The DNC never anticipated Kerry's liabilities. I am sure that they are kicking themselves that they blinked and allowed him to manipulate himself onto the ticket. But for a volume control on Dean's mic.
Now they are stuck with the liar.... but never lose sight of FACTOR X = Hillary Clinton. She has a vested interest in "4 more years of George Bush". What else could she run on in 2008? Hillary and Soros have their dirty hands all over this campaign. The liberal 527's are just a test run for 2008.
Mary Beth Cahill is in way over her head and the Kerry campaign soldiers consist of radical anti-culturists, anarchists, misguided youth who have been abandoned by their pot-smoking parents and very, very angry godless people.
You will see them on the streets of New York next week.
They will be naked, drunk, on drugs, dirty, hostile, aggressive and out of control.
History is repeating itself - John Kerry has enlisted radical protestors to rally against the establishment.
Bravo!
They are extremely worried that Kerry's entire war record will be made public prior to Nov. 2nd.
Even if the Swifties stopped today - the rat is out of the bag, it smells bad and it is swimming down river from Cambodia and up the Chappaquidick.
The DNC never anticipated Kerry's liabilities. I am sure that they are kicking themselves that they blinked and allowed him to manipulate himself onto the ticket. But for a volume control on Dean's mic.
Now they are stuck with the liar.... but never lose sight of FACTOR X = Hillary Clinton. She has a vested interest in "4 more years of George Bush". What else could she run on in 2008? Hillary and Soros have their dirty hands all over this campaign. The liberal 527's are just a test run for 2008.
Mary Beth Cahill is in way over her head and the Kerry campaign soldiers consist of radical anti-culturists, anarchists, misguided youth who have been abandoned by their pot-smoking parents and very, very angry godless people.
You will see them on the streets of New York next week.
They will be naked, drunk, on drugs, dirty, hostile, aggressive and out of control.
History is repeating itself - John Kerry has enlisted radical protestors to rally against the establishment.
Bravo!
Sunday, August 22, 2004
Form 180 - O
He swam to Cambodia
He sold out to Hanoi
He gave it all in gay Paris
He is a naughty boy
He said he had to do it
He gave a list of reasons
He wants to alter history
He can not face his treason
He sold out to Hanoi
He gave it all in gay Paris
He is a naughty boy
He said he had to do it
He gave a list of reasons
He wants to alter history
He can not face his treason
Fitness to Serve - O
On Saturday, August 21, 2004, Wayne Resnick, http://kfi640.com/hosts/wayneresnick.html, dedicated the majority of his talk radio show to setting the record straight concerning the allegations levied against Sen. John Kerry by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.("SBVfT") http://kerrylied.com/. and www.scaryjohnkerry.com/vietnam.htm.
Resnick spoke as if with absolute, first hand knowledge and authority about the events presented in the Unfit For Command book authored by John O'Neill and Jerome Corsi. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0895260174/002-5281770-9186409. Resnick methodically twisted the facts as presented by the SBVfT, misquoted them and then presented, according to him, a moment by moment "factual" accounting of what "really" happened. At no time during his radio broadcast did Mr. Resnick indicate that he had been in Vietnam, on the boat with Sen. Kerry nor that he had ever served in Vietnam. However, he did assure his audience that he had all of the real facts as opposed to the information being presented by O'Neill and Corsi.
Prior to taking a few phone calls, Mr. Resnick offered his professional analysis of the motivation behind the SBVfT and other Vietnam veterans who have taken a position against Sen. John Kerry. According to Resnick, the Vietnam veterans are not politically motivated they are psychologically motivated. Resnick stated that everybody knows that the veterans of the Vietnam war are filled with the enormous shame and quilt they have been harboring for over 30 years. He said that their shame and guilt has made them angry, and over the years they have become psychologically disturbed. His implication was that the veterans are emotionally disturbed because they participated in a war that everyone knew, just like Iraq, we should never have been involved in. He actually stated that the veterans from the Vietnam war are psychologically disturbed because veterans, including Sen. Kerry, have confirmed witnessing senseless massive atrocities during their service. He reminded his audience that these atrocities were reported by Sen. Kerry as soon as he returned to the United States.
Notwithstanding the specious, political motivation behind Mr. Resnick's comments, and assuming that his theory is correct, wouldn't his assessment of the psychologically flawed Vietnam veterans include Sen. Kerry and the 3 or 4 veterans who currently support him? If so, is America potentially in a very dangerous position should Sen. Kerry be elected?
Tom Eagleton, the former Junior Senator from Missouri, would certainly weigh in on the issue of psychological and emotional fitness to serve. George McGovern was forced to remove Eagleton as a Vice Presidential candidate when less than two weeks after their nomination the two candidates met at McGovern's vacation retreat in South Dakota where Eagleton also admitted that he had been in the hospital three times from 1960 to 1966, twice undergoing shock treatment for depression. As a result of massive Newspaper and party pressure demanding his resignation, a week later he did so.
If on the other hand, Resnick's public character assassination of the Vietnam veteran's emotion fitness was politically motivated, then one should examine the fact that with wild and recklessly abandon, he used corporate funding, as detailed on the sponsor list on his website, to attack the credibility of an entire generation of American heroes.
Immediately upon learning that several high profile entertainers had used their status to malign President Bush at a New York fund raiser, the public offered its response in the form of a massive campaign to the SlimFast parent company. The result was that the leader of the Bush basher's, Ms. Whoopie Goldberg, promptly lost her endorsement. The SlimFast organization was quick to respond to the emails, phone calls, FAXes and letters from decent Americans who were troubled by the fact that a corporation would support the character assassination of the President. SlimFast did not and apparently does not support such abhorrent behavior, thus Ms. Goldberg is no longer associated with the company.
Therefore, if the Vietnam veterans are in fact psychologically damaged, including Sen. Kerry, we need to step up to the mark and help them. We also need to encourage Sen. Kerry, for the sake of our National security, to follow Tom Eagleton's example and step out of the Presidential race. However, if Resnick is a liar, a deliberate character assassin and politically motivated to harm the good reputation of our veterans, we need to step up to the mark by immediately insisting that his sponsors rethink their support of his message.
Resnick spoke as if with absolute, first hand knowledge and authority about the events presented in the Unfit For Command book authored by John O'Neill and Jerome Corsi. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0895260174/002-5281770-9186409. Resnick methodically twisted the facts as presented by the SBVfT, misquoted them and then presented, according to him, a moment by moment "factual" accounting of what "really" happened. At no time during his radio broadcast did Mr. Resnick indicate that he had been in Vietnam, on the boat with Sen. Kerry nor that he had ever served in Vietnam. However, he did assure his audience that he had all of the real facts as opposed to the information being presented by O'Neill and Corsi.
Prior to taking a few phone calls, Mr. Resnick offered his professional analysis of the motivation behind the SBVfT and other Vietnam veterans who have taken a position against Sen. John Kerry. According to Resnick, the Vietnam veterans are not politically motivated they are psychologically motivated. Resnick stated that everybody knows that the veterans of the Vietnam war are filled with the enormous shame and quilt they have been harboring for over 30 years. He said that their shame and guilt has made them angry, and over the years they have become psychologically disturbed. His implication was that the veterans are emotionally disturbed because they participated in a war that everyone knew, just like Iraq, we should never have been involved in. He actually stated that the veterans from the Vietnam war are psychologically disturbed because veterans, including Sen. Kerry, have confirmed witnessing senseless massive atrocities during their service. He reminded his audience that these atrocities were reported by Sen. Kerry as soon as he returned to the United States.
Notwithstanding the specious, political motivation behind Mr. Resnick's comments, and assuming that his theory is correct, wouldn't his assessment of the psychologically flawed Vietnam veterans include Sen. Kerry and the 3 or 4 veterans who currently support him? If so, is America potentially in a very dangerous position should Sen. Kerry be elected?
Tom Eagleton, the former Junior Senator from Missouri, would certainly weigh in on the issue of psychological and emotional fitness to serve. George McGovern was forced to remove Eagleton as a Vice Presidential candidate when less than two weeks after their nomination the two candidates met at McGovern's vacation retreat in South Dakota where Eagleton also admitted that he had been in the hospital three times from 1960 to 1966, twice undergoing shock treatment for depression. As a result of massive Newspaper and party pressure demanding his resignation, a week later he did so.
If on the other hand, Resnick's public character assassination of the Vietnam veteran's emotion fitness was politically motivated, then one should examine the fact that with wild and recklessly abandon, he used corporate funding, as detailed on the sponsor list on his website, to attack the credibility of an entire generation of American heroes.
Immediately upon learning that several high profile entertainers had used their status to malign President Bush at a New York fund raiser, the public offered its response in the form of a massive campaign to the SlimFast parent company. The result was that the leader of the Bush basher's, Ms. Whoopie Goldberg, promptly lost her endorsement. The SlimFast organization was quick to respond to the emails, phone calls, FAXes and letters from decent Americans who were troubled by the fact that a corporation would support the character assassination of the President. SlimFast did not and apparently does not support such abhorrent behavior, thus Ms. Goldberg is no longer associated with the company.
Therefore, if the Vietnam veterans are in fact psychologically damaged, including Sen. Kerry, we need to step up to the mark and help them. We also need to encourage Sen. Kerry, for the sake of our National security, to follow Tom Eagleton's example and step out of the Presidential race. However, if Resnick is a liar, a deliberate character assassin and politically motivated to harm the good reputation of our veterans, we need to step up to the mark by immediately insisting that his sponsors rethink their support of his message.
Saturday, August 21, 2004
The Battle of the 527 orgs - O
How could one counter: What did Kerry say to condemn of Michael Moore's movie?
Certainly nothing publicly. It is a good question to pose to all of the talk show talking heads.
Kerry will claim that he has not seen the movie.
Kerry will claim that a movie made for entertainment is far different from a serious attack ad.
Kerry will claim that Michael Moore is not in anyway associated with his campaign.
..........blah, blah ..... the puke will float.
To understand how John Kerry has been programmed by the far left to handle every situation, counter any statement and develop their strategy one would need to become a student of Lenin, Engels, Marx, Pieck, Ulbricht, etc. Communism is here, my friend. Is it a coincidence that all of the former members of the communist party in Bulgaria, are now Democrats. In essence for them, nothing has changed, and they hate the fact that Bulgaria is a Democracy. They changed their party name to stay under the radar.
The pinkos are still in eastern Europe, and they are here. They have been here for years. It was quite interesting to note that at the "W" rally in Santa Monica the Kerry supporters had HUGE signs with "CODE PINK" on them. They are clever. They accuse others of being what they are so that when they are uncovered, they can easily say, "They want you to believe about us what we have all known about them for years." It is a time tested technique.
Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua, the Middle East have all successfully employed the methodology.
The Democratic party was the easiest for the Communists to infiltrate. They pulled members from the poor, uneducated, and minorities within our society and began making promises for a better life, more benefits and illegitimately tried to associate the Republican party with the elitist rich. However, one look into the names of the donors to the Clintons, Obama, Kerry and other Dems and you will find out that the Democrats are the party of the wealthy and provided. When I last looked, not much has changed for the poor and disenfranchised within the Democratic party. It would take less than one millisecond for them to point at George Bush with a wagging blaming finger.
They are marching fast and furiously toward their final battle to destroy our society as we know it. Just look at their platforms: Legalize drugs, open borders, open ended abortions, liberal judges, to remove God from everything, eliminate all of our rights to own guns, anon anon.
John Kerry is a puppet - George Soros is the mastermind. He has created a huge network of wealthy individuals who support his agenda because it will give them control. In the final analysis, it may not matter what Kerry says about Moore, or anything else. George Soros has created, funded and launched a dangerous machine aimed at every aspect of conservative values and morality. Soros doesn't care about Kerry anymore than you or I do. He needs a warm body and John Kerry may possible be one. Soros is closer to Teresa Heinz Kerry than he will ever be to John. George Soros has nothing in common with John Kerry, and John Kerry is expendable. Remember, John F Kerry wants to be JFK.
According to information received from a friend:
These are the wealthy funders of the democraticprogressive `527' groups.There are 3 pages to this article, links at thebottom:
http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/top/features/documents/03997127.asp
Certainly nothing publicly. It is a good question to pose to all of the talk show talking heads.
Kerry will claim that he has not seen the movie.
Kerry will claim that a movie made for entertainment is far different from a serious attack ad.
Kerry will claim that Michael Moore is not in anyway associated with his campaign.
..........blah, blah ..... the puke will float.
To understand how John Kerry has been programmed by the far left to handle every situation, counter any statement and develop their strategy one would need to become a student of Lenin, Engels, Marx, Pieck, Ulbricht, etc. Communism is here, my friend. Is it a coincidence that all of the former members of the communist party in Bulgaria, are now Democrats. In essence for them, nothing has changed, and they hate the fact that Bulgaria is a Democracy. They changed their party name to stay under the radar.
The pinkos are still in eastern Europe, and they are here. They have been here for years. It was quite interesting to note that at the "W" rally in Santa Monica the Kerry supporters had HUGE signs with "CODE PINK" on them. They are clever. They accuse others of being what they are so that when they are uncovered, they can easily say, "They want you to believe about us what we have all known about them for years." It is a time tested technique.
Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua, the Middle East have all successfully employed the methodology.
The Democratic party was the easiest for the Communists to infiltrate. They pulled members from the poor, uneducated, and minorities within our society and began making promises for a better life, more benefits and illegitimately tried to associate the Republican party with the elitist rich. However, one look into the names of the donors to the Clintons, Obama, Kerry and other Dems and you will find out that the Democrats are the party of the wealthy and provided. When I last looked, not much has changed for the poor and disenfranchised within the Democratic party. It would take less than one millisecond for them to point at George Bush with a wagging blaming finger.
They are marching fast and furiously toward their final battle to destroy our society as we know it. Just look at their platforms: Legalize drugs, open borders, open ended abortions, liberal judges, to remove God from everything, eliminate all of our rights to own guns, anon anon.
John Kerry is a puppet - George Soros is the mastermind. He has created a huge network of wealthy individuals who support his agenda because it will give them control. In the final analysis, it may not matter what Kerry says about Moore, or anything else. George Soros has created, funded and launched a dangerous machine aimed at every aspect of conservative values and morality. Soros doesn't care about Kerry anymore than you or I do. He needs a warm body and John Kerry may possible be one. Soros is closer to Teresa Heinz Kerry than he will ever be to John. George Soros has nothing in common with John Kerry, and John Kerry is expendable. Remember, John F Kerry wants to be JFK.
According to information received from a friend:
These are the wealthy funders of the democraticprogressive `527' groups.There are 3 pages to this article, links at thebottom:
http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/top/features/documents/03997127.asp
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)