He swam to Cambodia
He sold out to Hanoi
He gave it all in gay Paris
He is a naughty boy
He said he had to do it
He gave a list of reasons
He wants to alter history
He can not face his treason
Sunday, August 22, 2004
Fitness to Serve - O
On Saturday, August 21, 2004, Wayne Resnick, http://kfi640.com/hosts/wayneresnick.html, dedicated the majority of his talk radio show to setting the record straight concerning the allegations levied against Sen. John Kerry by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.("SBVfT") http://kerrylied.com/. and www.scaryjohnkerry.com/vietnam.htm.
Resnick spoke as if with absolute, first hand knowledge and authority about the events presented in the Unfit For Command book authored by John O'Neill and Jerome Corsi. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0895260174/002-5281770-9186409. Resnick methodically twisted the facts as presented by the SBVfT, misquoted them and then presented, according to him, a moment by moment "factual" accounting of what "really" happened. At no time during his radio broadcast did Mr. Resnick indicate that he had been in Vietnam, on the boat with Sen. Kerry nor that he had ever served in Vietnam. However, he did assure his audience that he had all of the real facts as opposed to the information being presented by O'Neill and Corsi.
Prior to taking a few phone calls, Mr. Resnick offered his professional analysis of the motivation behind the SBVfT and other Vietnam veterans who have taken a position against Sen. John Kerry. According to Resnick, the Vietnam veterans are not politically motivated they are psychologically motivated. Resnick stated that everybody knows that the veterans of the Vietnam war are filled with the enormous shame and quilt they have been harboring for over 30 years. He said that their shame and guilt has made them angry, and over the years they have become psychologically disturbed. His implication was that the veterans are emotionally disturbed because they participated in a war that everyone knew, just like Iraq, we should never have been involved in. He actually stated that the veterans from the Vietnam war are psychologically disturbed because veterans, including Sen. Kerry, have confirmed witnessing senseless massive atrocities during their service. He reminded his audience that these atrocities were reported by Sen. Kerry as soon as he returned to the United States.
Notwithstanding the specious, political motivation behind Mr. Resnick's comments, and assuming that his theory is correct, wouldn't his assessment of the psychologically flawed Vietnam veterans include Sen. Kerry and the 3 or 4 veterans who currently support him? If so, is America potentially in a very dangerous position should Sen. Kerry be elected?
Tom Eagleton, the former Junior Senator from Missouri, would certainly weigh in on the issue of psychological and emotional fitness to serve. George McGovern was forced to remove Eagleton as a Vice Presidential candidate when less than two weeks after their nomination the two candidates met at McGovern's vacation retreat in South Dakota where Eagleton also admitted that he had been in the hospital three times from 1960 to 1966, twice undergoing shock treatment for depression. As a result of massive Newspaper and party pressure demanding his resignation, a week later he did so.
If on the other hand, Resnick's public character assassination of the Vietnam veteran's emotion fitness was politically motivated, then one should examine the fact that with wild and recklessly abandon, he used corporate funding, as detailed on the sponsor list on his website, to attack the credibility of an entire generation of American heroes.
Immediately upon learning that several high profile entertainers had used their status to malign President Bush at a New York fund raiser, the public offered its response in the form of a massive campaign to the SlimFast parent company. The result was that the leader of the Bush basher's, Ms. Whoopie Goldberg, promptly lost her endorsement. The SlimFast organization was quick to respond to the emails, phone calls, FAXes and letters from decent Americans who were troubled by the fact that a corporation would support the character assassination of the President. SlimFast did not and apparently does not support such abhorrent behavior, thus Ms. Goldberg is no longer associated with the company.
Therefore, if the Vietnam veterans are in fact psychologically damaged, including Sen. Kerry, we need to step up to the mark and help them. We also need to encourage Sen. Kerry, for the sake of our National security, to follow Tom Eagleton's example and step out of the Presidential race. However, if Resnick is a liar, a deliberate character assassin and politically motivated to harm the good reputation of our veterans, we need to step up to the mark by immediately insisting that his sponsors rethink their support of his message.
Resnick spoke as if with absolute, first hand knowledge and authority about the events presented in the Unfit For Command book authored by John O'Neill and Jerome Corsi. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0895260174/002-5281770-9186409. Resnick methodically twisted the facts as presented by the SBVfT, misquoted them and then presented, according to him, a moment by moment "factual" accounting of what "really" happened. At no time during his radio broadcast did Mr. Resnick indicate that he had been in Vietnam, on the boat with Sen. Kerry nor that he had ever served in Vietnam. However, he did assure his audience that he had all of the real facts as opposed to the information being presented by O'Neill and Corsi.
Prior to taking a few phone calls, Mr. Resnick offered his professional analysis of the motivation behind the SBVfT and other Vietnam veterans who have taken a position against Sen. John Kerry. According to Resnick, the Vietnam veterans are not politically motivated they are psychologically motivated. Resnick stated that everybody knows that the veterans of the Vietnam war are filled with the enormous shame and quilt they have been harboring for over 30 years. He said that their shame and guilt has made them angry, and over the years they have become psychologically disturbed. His implication was that the veterans are emotionally disturbed because they participated in a war that everyone knew, just like Iraq, we should never have been involved in. He actually stated that the veterans from the Vietnam war are psychologically disturbed because veterans, including Sen. Kerry, have confirmed witnessing senseless massive atrocities during their service. He reminded his audience that these atrocities were reported by Sen. Kerry as soon as he returned to the United States.
Notwithstanding the specious, political motivation behind Mr. Resnick's comments, and assuming that his theory is correct, wouldn't his assessment of the psychologically flawed Vietnam veterans include Sen. Kerry and the 3 or 4 veterans who currently support him? If so, is America potentially in a very dangerous position should Sen. Kerry be elected?
Tom Eagleton, the former Junior Senator from Missouri, would certainly weigh in on the issue of psychological and emotional fitness to serve. George McGovern was forced to remove Eagleton as a Vice Presidential candidate when less than two weeks after their nomination the two candidates met at McGovern's vacation retreat in South Dakota where Eagleton also admitted that he had been in the hospital three times from 1960 to 1966, twice undergoing shock treatment for depression. As a result of massive Newspaper and party pressure demanding his resignation, a week later he did so.
If on the other hand, Resnick's public character assassination of the Vietnam veteran's emotion fitness was politically motivated, then one should examine the fact that with wild and recklessly abandon, he used corporate funding, as detailed on the sponsor list on his website, to attack the credibility of an entire generation of American heroes.
Immediately upon learning that several high profile entertainers had used their status to malign President Bush at a New York fund raiser, the public offered its response in the form of a massive campaign to the SlimFast parent company. The result was that the leader of the Bush basher's, Ms. Whoopie Goldberg, promptly lost her endorsement. The SlimFast organization was quick to respond to the emails, phone calls, FAXes and letters from decent Americans who were troubled by the fact that a corporation would support the character assassination of the President. SlimFast did not and apparently does not support such abhorrent behavior, thus Ms. Goldberg is no longer associated with the company.
Therefore, if the Vietnam veterans are in fact psychologically damaged, including Sen. Kerry, we need to step up to the mark and help them. We also need to encourage Sen. Kerry, for the sake of our National security, to follow Tom Eagleton's example and step out of the Presidential race. However, if Resnick is a liar, a deliberate character assassin and politically motivated to harm the good reputation of our veterans, we need to step up to the mark by immediately insisting that his sponsors rethink their support of his message.
Saturday, August 21, 2004
The Battle of the 527 orgs - O
How could one counter: What did Kerry say to condemn of Michael Moore's movie?
Certainly nothing publicly. It is a good question to pose to all of the talk show talking heads.
Kerry will claim that he has not seen the movie.
Kerry will claim that a movie made for entertainment is far different from a serious attack ad.
Kerry will claim that Michael Moore is not in anyway associated with his campaign.
..........blah, blah ..... the puke will float.
To understand how John Kerry has been programmed by the far left to handle every situation, counter any statement and develop their strategy one would need to become a student of Lenin, Engels, Marx, Pieck, Ulbricht, etc. Communism is here, my friend. Is it a coincidence that all of the former members of the communist party in Bulgaria, are now Democrats. In essence for them, nothing has changed, and they hate the fact that Bulgaria is a Democracy. They changed their party name to stay under the radar.
The pinkos are still in eastern Europe, and they are here. They have been here for years. It was quite interesting to note that at the "W" rally in Santa Monica the Kerry supporters had HUGE signs with "CODE PINK" on them. They are clever. They accuse others of being what they are so that when they are uncovered, they can easily say, "They want you to believe about us what we have all known about them for years." It is a time tested technique.
Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua, the Middle East have all successfully employed the methodology.
The Democratic party was the easiest for the Communists to infiltrate. They pulled members from the poor, uneducated, and minorities within our society and began making promises for a better life, more benefits and illegitimately tried to associate the Republican party with the elitist rich. However, one look into the names of the donors to the Clintons, Obama, Kerry and other Dems and you will find out that the Democrats are the party of the wealthy and provided. When I last looked, not much has changed for the poor and disenfranchised within the Democratic party. It would take less than one millisecond for them to point at George Bush with a wagging blaming finger.
They are marching fast and furiously toward their final battle to destroy our society as we know it. Just look at their platforms: Legalize drugs, open borders, open ended abortions, liberal judges, to remove God from everything, eliminate all of our rights to own guns, anon anon.
John Kerry is a puppet - George Soros is the mastermind. He has created a huge network of wealthy individuals who support his agenda because it will give them control. In the final analysis, it may not matter what Kerry says about Moore, or anything else. George Soros has created, funded and launched a dangerous machine aimed at every aspect of conservative values and morality. Soros doesn't care about Kerry anymore than you or I do. He needs a warm body and John Kerry may possible be one. Soros is closer to Teresa Heinz Kerry than he will ever be to John. George Soros has nothing in common with John Kerry, and John Kerry is expendable. Remember, John F Kerry wants to be JFK.
According to information received from a friend:
These are the wealthy funders of the democraticprogressive `527' groups.There are 3 pages to this article, links at thebottom:
http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/top/features/documents/03997127.asp
Certainly nothing publicly. It is a good question to pose to all of the talk show talking heads.
Kerry will claim that he has not seen the movie.
Kerry will claim that a movie made for entertainment is far different from a serious attack ad.
Kerry will claim that Michael Moore is not in anyway associated with his campaign.
..........blah, blah ..... the puke will float.
To understand how John Kerry has been programmed by the far left to handle every situation, counter any statement and develop their strategy one would need to become a student of Lenin, Engels, Marx, Pieck, Ulbricht, etc. Communism is here, my friend. Is it a coincidence that all of the former members of the communist party in Bulgaria, are now Democrats. In essence for them, nothing has changed, and they hate the fact that Bulgaria is a Democracy. They changed their party name to stay under the radar.
The pinkos are still in eastern Europe, and they are here. They have been here for years. It was quite interesting to note that at the "W" rally in Santa Monica the Kerry supporters had HUGE signs with "CODE PINK" on them. They are clever. They accuse others of being what they are so that when they are uncovered, they can easily say, "They want you to believe about us what we have all known about them for years." It is a time tested technique.
Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua, the Middle East have all successfully employed the methodology.
The Democratic party was the easiest for the Communists to infiltrate. They pulled members from the poor, uneducated, and minorities within our society and began making promises for a better life, more benefits and illegitimately tried to associate the Republican party with the elitist rich. However, one look into the names of the donors to the Clintons, Obama, Kerry and other Dems and you will find out that the Democrats are the party of the wealthy and provided. When I last looked, not much has changed for the poor and disenfranchised within the Democratic party. It would take less than one millisecond for them to point at George Bush with a wagging blaming finger.
They are marching fast and furiously toward their final battle to destroy our society as we know it. Just look at their platforms: Legalize drugs, open borders, open ended abortions, liberal judges, to remove God from everything, eliminate all of our rights to own guns, anon anon.
John Kerry is a puppet - George Soros is the mastermind. He has created a huge network of wealthy individuals who support his agenda because it will give them control. In the final analysis, it may not matter what Kerry says about Moore, or anything else. George Soros has created, funded and launched a dangerous machine aimed at every aspect of conservative values and morality. Soros doesn't care about Kerry anymore than you or I do. He needs a warm body and John Kerry may possible be one. Soros is closer to Teresa Heinz Kerry than he will ever be to John. George Soros has nothing in common with John Kerry, and John Kerry is expendable. Remember, John F Kerry wants to be JFK.
According to information received from a friend:
These are the wealthy funders of the democraticprogressive `527' groups.There are 3 pages to this article, links at thebottom:
http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/top/features/documents/03997127.asp
What is the Purple Heart? - O
A recent survey indicated that there is a significant percentage within the US population not familiar with military service awards and medals. The current controversy initiated by veterans who have taken exception with the legitimacy of Sen. Kerry's actions while serving in and post Vietnam has created a great deal of confusion over the references to certain medals and citations. Sen. Kerry received three Purple Hearts and several other service medals during his four months of active service in Vietnam. The receipt of his third Purple Heart provided Sen. Kerry with a swift exit from Vietnam. In question is whether Sen. Kerry earned his service medals with complete and absolute legitimacy.
While not complete, the following links are intended to provide a basic sense of the requirements for being awarded medals, the significance of being awarded and the sense of honor and pride associated with the receipt of the medals. Sen. Kerry threw his medals or possibly only the ribbons associated with his medals over a wall in protest of the war upon returning from Vietnam. This action is viewed by many veterans and American civilians as contrary and insulting to the honorable service by other men and women, and their families, who have a great sense of pride in connection with the heroic actions and sacrifice required to receive the service medals.
Please feel free to pass the links page along to your friends and email lists who may not have served, or who for another reason may not be completely familiar with the medals and awards. It would be difficult to completely understand or appreciate the public debate and formal charges concerning Sen. Kerry's service medals without having a fundamental understanding of the medals and awards in question.
For reference purposes, Sen. Kerry served in the U.S. Navy.
Medal of Honor
http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/moh1.htm
Purple Heart
http://www.purpleheart.org/explanation.htm
U.S. Navy & Marines combined Medals
http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/navawards/blnavawards.htm
U.S. Navy Medals
http://www.gruntsmilitary.com/navyrib.shtml
U.S. Coast Guard Medals
http://www.gruntsmilitary.com/cgribs.shtml
U.S Army Medals
http://www.americal.org/awards/achv-svc.htm
U.S. Air Force Medals
http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/afmedals/blafmedals.htm
While not complete, the following links are intended to provide a basic sense of the requirements for being awarded medals, the significance of being awarded and the sense of honor and pride associated with the receipt of the medals. Sen. Kerry threw his medals or possibly only the ribbons associated with his medals over a wall in protest of the war upon returning from Vietnam. This action is viewed by many veterans and American civilians as contrary and insulting to the honorable service by other men and women, and their families, who have a great sense of pride in connection with the heroic actions and sacrifice required to receive the service medals.
Please feel free to pass the links page along to your friends and email lists who may not have served, or who for another reason may not be completely familiar with the medals and awards. It would be difficult to completely understand or appreciate the public debate and formal charges concerning Sen. Kerry's service medals without having a fundamental understanding of the medals and awards in question.
For reference purposes, Sen. Kerry served in the U.S. Navy.
Medal of Honor
http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/moh1.htm
Purple Heart
http://www.purpleheart.org/explanation.htm
U.S. Navy & Marines combined Medals
http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/navawards/blnavawards.htm
U.S. Navy Medals
http://www.gruntsmilitary.com/navyrib.shtml
U.S. Coast Guard Medals
http://www.gruntsmilitary.com/cgribs.shtml
U.S Army Medals
http://www.americal.org/awards/achv-svc.htm
U.S. Air Force Medals
http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/afmedals/blafmedals.htm
Thursday, August 19, 2004
The Last Samurai - O
Perhaps with the public filing of the Judicial Watch request for investigation of Sen. John Kerry's actions in connection with receiving his medals and his post active service activities, the SEAL, Green Beret, SF (wannabe phonies) will begin to think twice and then again before they attempt to capitalize on lies, factitious information and actions inconsistent with honorable service and patriotism.
Any person profiting from a falsified military service claim should heed the consequences Mr./Sen. Kerry faces today. A lie is a lie, big or small, the consequence rests within the gain.
If proven to be a liar and traitor, there may need to be a totally new WALL OF SHAME. Perhaps alas, John F. Kerry will prove to be the Last Samurai.
Any person profiting from a falsified military service claim should heed the consequences Mr./Sen. Kerry faces today. A lie is a lie, big or small, the consequence rests within the gain.
If proven to be a liar and traitor, there may need to be a totally new WALL OF SHAME. Perhaps alas, John F. Kerry will prove to be the Last Samurai.
Sunday, August 15, 2004
Reaction to O'Neill and Kerry on Cavett - O
Reaction to the O'Neill/Kerry 1971Cavett Show debate rebroadcast on C-SPAN
Dateline 2004:
On Kerry - He remains the quintessential flipper; the same person he was yesterday, is today and will no doubt be tomorrow. His answers are artfully crafted to evade the questions, deflecting the conversation to his next factious point.
His performance of 33 years ago was well coached on the paltry few points he wanted to keynote and fell flat when faced with substance, facts and evidence.
While his positions change from day to day on policies, his gutless personality has not changed since 1971. He remains the same artful presenter of factitious information; he uses subtle lies based on partial truths, managing to almost completely suppress the personal rage welling within his dark soul when he is confronted by the absolute truth.
On O'Neill – flawless then flawless now.
Dateline 2004:
On Kerry - He remains the quintessential flipper; the same person he was yesterday, is today and will no doubt be tomorrow. His answers are artfully crafted to evade the questions, deflecting the conversation to his next factious point.
His performance of 33 years ago was well coached on the paltry few points he wanted to keynote and fell flat when faced with substance, facts and evidence.
While his positions change from day to day on policies, his gutless personality has not changed since 1971. He remains the same artful presenter of factitious information; he uses subtle lies based on partial truths, managing to almost completely suppress the personal rage welling within his dark soul when he is confronted by the absolute truth.
On O'Neill – flawless then flawless now.
Friday, August 13, 2004
George Soros and the Liberal Media - O
If you have not visited the following website, you will certainly want to take a look at the important information that has been posted there.
http://www.scaryjohnkerry.com/
Two days ago 500 members of the liberal media met via conference call to determine their agenda between now and November 2nd. The net result is that they are going to use the skewed employment figures to blast George Bush on the economy while John Kerry continues to lie and perpetrate lies from within his organization. They are determined to distract us from the facts while they poison our minds. George Soros's Kerry machine is brilliant at this tactic; they have had a great deal of practice at destruction, deception and lies.
A few brave and good men have worked very hard to bring the facts forward. They are working hard so that we can continue to enjoy our free time, vacations and week end's golfing and playing tennis.
We can not all dedicate the time and energy to bringing the facts forward as the men who are behind the http://www.scaryjohnkerry.com/ website. But, we can support them by sending people to the website and by sending them a few dollars to help them with their mission.
Make sure that you watch the new videos, they are chilling.
http://www.scaryjohnkerry.com/
Two days ago 500 members of the liberal media met via conference call to determine their agenda between now and November 2nd. The net result is that they are going to use the skewed employment figures to blast George Bush on the economy while John Kerry continues to lie and perpetrate lies from within his organization. They are determined to distract us from the facts while they poison our minds. George Soros's Kerry machine is brilliant at this tactic; they have had a great deal of practice at destruction, deception and lies.
A few brave and good men have worked very hard to bring the facts forward. They are working hard so that we can continue to enjoy our free time, vacations and week end's golfing and playing tennis.
We can not all dedicate the time and energy to bringing the facts forward as the men who are behind the http://www.scaryjohnkerry.com/ website. But, we can support them by sending people to the website and by sending them a few dollars to help them with their mission.
Make sure that you watch the new videos, they are chilling.
They Smelled Like Poop - O
If you are curious to know where some, if not many, of the Middle Eastern illegal aliens are these days, just attend a pro-George Bush rally and you will see them assaulting the “W” supporters.
I participated in the rally welcoming “W” to Santa Monica on Thursday, August 12th, 2004. There was an overwhelmingly large and very patriotic group assembled to support the President. The group represented all ages, sizes and very ethnically diverse. Many of them were dressed in red, white or blue or a combination and most of them were proudly waving American flags.
The group was large enough to merit splitting into two smaller groups on either side of the intersection leading into the Santa Monica airport. They had proper permits to sell hats, shirts and pins, and they were clearly there to show their support for the President and the United States.
Within 15 minutes the Kerry/Soros crew showed up. By the way, the Bush group outnumbered the Kerry/Soros crew by 5 to 1 until they called for reinforcements. They immediately began opening up large tables and laying down huge piles of anti-Bush, anti-American placards, and summarily demanded that the Bush people leave their spot. They literally seeped like sewage into a basement. Within a very short time their crap was everywhere. Consequently the Bush people left the area in an orderly fashion and consolidated on one corner, opposite the Kerry/Soros crew.
However, seeing the Bush people move to another corner did not satisfy the Kerry/Soros crew. They tried to force themselves and move into the Bush people, by pushing and shoving them. The Kerry/Soros crew carried large placards, which were designed to cause bodily injury if they made contact with anyone. And they did try to wave them around to accidentally whack the Bush people. But, worse the Kerry/Soros group smelled. Seriously, they smelled like pot, vomit and poop.
I think stinking was a part of their strategy. They smelled so bad that they were making the Bush people back away, thus creating an opportunity for the Kerry/Soros crew to squat on the Bush area so to speak. They wanted to push the Bush people back so that the media and the public could not see how much support "W" actually has in Los Angeles County, in particular, in Liberalville a.k.a. Santa Monica.
The most curious factor was the number of Middle Eastern and Iranian men who were a part of the Kerry/Soros crew. As a matter of fact, the crew consisted of lesbians, Middle Easterners and gays. (No, the Governor of New Jersey was not there.) Most of them wore DarthVaderesk “black” garb with tough person slogans on them. None of them, not one of them, carried an American flag or any item denoting patriotism. They were pushy, threatening and again, they smelled like poop.
I guess the Middle Eastern illegals have not incorporated American hygiene into their new régime. Maybe George Soros will send them to a finishing school with some of the 527 money so they can blend more easily into our society as they assemble their weapons of mass destruction. Thank you Mr. Soros.
New York will be amazing if Santa Monica is a teaser.
I participated in the rally welcoming “W” to Santa Monica on Thursday, August 12th, 2004. There was an overwhelmingly large and very patriotic group assembled to support the President. The group represented all ages, sizes and very ethnically diverse. Many of them were dressed in red, white or blue or a combination and most of them were proudly waving American flags.
The group was large enough to merit splitting into two smaller groups on either side of the intersection leading into the Santa Monica airport. They had proper permits to sell hats, shirts and pins, and they were clearly there to show their support for the President and the United States.
Within 15 minutes the Kerry/Soros crew showed up. By the way, the Bush group outnumbered the Kerry/Soros crew by 5 to 1 until they called for reinforcements. They immediately began opening up large tables and laying down huge piles of anti-Bush, anti-American placards, and summarily demanded that the Bush people leave their spot. They literally seeped like sewage into a basement. Within a very short time their crap was everywhere. Consequently the Bush people left the area in an orderly fashion and consolidated on one corner, opposite the Kerry/Soros crew.
However, seeing the Bush people move to another corner did not satisfy the Kerry/Soros crew. They tried to force themselves and move into the Bush people, by pushing and shoving them. The Kerry/Soros crew carried large placards, which were designed to cause bodily injury if they made contact with anyone. And they did try to wave them around to accidentally whack the Bush people. But, worse the Kerry/Soros group smelled. Seriously, they smelled like pot, vomit and poop.
I think stinking was a part of their strategy. They smelled so bad that they were making the Bush people back away, thus creating an opportunity for the Kerry/Soros crew to squat on the Bush area so to speak. They wanted to push the Bush people back so that the media and the public could not see how much support "W" actually has in Los Angeles County, in particular, in Liberalville a.k.a. Santa Monica.
The most curious factor was the number of Middle Eastern and Iranian men who were a part of the Kerry/Soros crew. As a matter of fact, the crew consisted of lesbians, Middle Easterners and gays. (No, the Governor of New Jersey was not there.) Most of them wore DarthVaderesk “black” garb with tough person slogans on them. None of them, not one of them, carried an American flag or any item denoting patriotism. They were pushy, threatening and again, they smelled like poop.
I guess the Middle Eastern illegals have not incorporated American hygiene into their new régime. Maybe George Soros will send them to a finishing school with some of the 527 money so they can blend more easily into our society as they assemble their weapons of mass destruction. Thank you Mr. Soros.
New York will be amazing if Santa Monica is a teaser.
The truth about who wants to control oil prices - O
Why are oil prices rising when the supply exceeds the current level of demand?
Hedge funds are manipulating the price of oil on the international markets.
Who is the world's biggest player in Hedge funds
George Soros
Why would George Soros want to keep oil prices high?
George Bush
nuff said ....
National Post
... George Soros, probably the world's most famous hedge fund manager, collected a salary of US$750-million in 2003, placing him at the top of Institutional ...
www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/financialpost/ story.html?id=b17a72ec-9f0c-4c74-bf83-098ff21c18e2 - 27k -
Hedge funds are manipulating the price of oil on the international markets.
Who is the world's biggest player in Hedge funds
George Soros
Why would George Soros want to keep oil prices high?
George Bush
nuff said ....
National Post
... George Soros, probably the world's most famous hedge fund manager, collected a salary of US$750-million in 2003, placing him at the top of Institutional ...
www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/financialpost/ story.html?id=b17a72ec-9f0c-4c74-bf83-098ff21c18e2 - 27k -
Did Kerry Make It To Cambodia?
Who would you believe - John Kerry or Andrew Antippas?
Washington TimesAugust 13, 2004 Pg. 21
Fact And Fiction Did Kerry make it to Cambodia?
By Andrew Antippas
I was startled to read the Aug. 10 issue of the editorial page of The Washington Times concerning the assertion attributed to Sen. John Kerry that he had spent Christmas 1968 aboard his swift boat some five miles inside Cambodia and had been shot at by our Vietnamese allies, as well as the Khmer Rouge.I would like to offer some insights and some background about the subject of Cambodia as it related to the U.S. war effort in Vietnam in that period. I served as a Foreign Service officer in the American embassy in Saigon from March 1968 to February 1970 and subsequently at the American embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, from 1970 to 1972.My job in the political section of our embassy in Saigon was to be the "Cambodia Man." My principal tasks were to follow border incidents involving U.S. forces along the Cambodian border. I worked as a liaison with U.S. forces, wrote reports to Washington, followed the intelligence about Communist use of Cambodia and, given that we did not have an embassy in Phnon Penh at that time, maintained contact with the Australian embassies in Saigon and Phnom Penh because the Australians were the U.S. protecting power in Cambodia.I also worked with the International Control Commission (ICC) in Saigon and Phnom Penh.The International Control Commission had been established by the Geneva Agreements of 1954 that ended the French Indochina war. The ICC had separate commission offices in the former French states of Indochina: North and South Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. The offices were to monitor their local military situations. The ICC was staffed by representatives of Canada, Poland and India. While really powerless to enforce the 1954 agreements and the ongoing IndoChina war, the four commissions were kept in place as some sort of presence on the ground. Prince Sihanouk, the head of state of Cambodia, used the ICC to chastise the United States and Republic of Vietnam vigorously and publicly for alleged border incidents. If there was a border incident, he dispatched the ICC to the site. Prince Sihanouk had broken diplomatic relations with the United States in 1965 over continuing border incidents.With the increasing use of Cambodia by the Communists after 1965, the United States offered helicopters and communications equipment to the ICC in Phnom Penh in 1968 to help the commission do its job of locating the more than 12 Communist base areas in the technically "neutral" state of Cambodia. It should be recalled that Communist troops (VC/NVA Viet Cong/North Vietnamese) came out of the sanctuaries in the "Parrot's Beak" area of Cambodia, a mere 35 miles west of Saigon, for the Tet attacks on Saigon in January 1968. However, Prince Sihanouk, as the official host of the ICC, declined the offer of equipment, saying bluntly that the Russians would not be pleased. The Cambodians did agree in 1968 to receive U.S. intelligence about the details of Communist sanctuaries.After Richard Nixon assumed office in 1969, Prince Sihanouk agreed to reopen the U.S. embassy, but insisted on the closure of the Phnom Penh ICC office to keep the political balance between the Communists and the United States.During 1968, there were some 50 "incidents" along the Cambodian border involving U.S. forces. Some of these incidents involved the U.S. "Brown Water Navy." That is, the Navy Riverine Forces, which used small patrol craft such as PBRs and swift boats in the Mekong Delta and along the waterways adjacent to the Cambodian border.I also worked with the Navy on the issue of gun-running through Cambodia. The Navy was particularly seized with the debate over whether the Vietnamese Communists were being resupplied through the "Sihanouk Trail," which was the extension of the Ho Chi Minh Trail, or by sea aboard Chinese freighters and hundred-ton steel-hulled trawlers through the port of Sihanoukville. The Johnson administration demanded proof of the CIA and Navy intelligence positions that postulated that the only way munitions of the amount being expended in South Vietnam's III and IV Corps could be resupplied was by ship. The Navy and local CIA station did a good job of making their case, but the supergrade CIA representatives and the senior State Department officials who came out from Washington to investigate the issue in October 1968 refused to accept that thesis because to do so would require the administration to put heat on Prince Sihanouk to do something about the use of Sihanoukville by the Communists.After Prince Sihanouk's ouster in 1970, we in the embassy in Phnom Penh confirmed the assumptions by the CIA and U.S. Navy in Saigon concerning the trade through "neutral" Cambodia's port of Sihanoukville.I worked closely with Vice Adm. Elmo Zumwalt, who was the commander of naval forces in Vietnam beginning in mid-1968 and before he moved up to become chief of naval operations in 1970. Adm. Zumwalt, unlike most senior American military, had served as an assistant naval attache in Europe as a more junior officer and knew the international political and diplomatic game. Adm. Zumwalt was politically sensitive about the activities of his Riverine units causing border incidents. There were established U.S. forces "rules of engagement" that governed the activities of American forces near the Cambodian border.There was, for example, a "no-fly zone" along the Cambodian border, where U.S. forces ground units, aircraft and boats were prohibited from routinely approaching or entering Cambodia. I should note here that allied forces in Vietnam from Australia, New Zealand, Korea, Thailand and the Philippines were used in areas away from the border just to avoid adding diplomatic problems.As U.S. forces in 1966 and 1967 progressively pushed the Vietnamese Communists farther and farther away from Vietnamese population centers, U.S. commanders sought permission for "hot pursuit" operations against Communist forces attacking from Cambodian territory. This always was denied, much to the military's frustration.The Cambodians patrolled the crossing border points on the Bassac and Mekong Rivers and had fortifications above the frontier. In mid-1968, just before Adm. Zumwalt took over, a U.S. Army LCM landing craft sailing north on the Mekong River — loaded with lubricants, gas, rations, beer and a forklift, as well as a number of U.S. soldiers — missed the turn from the Mekong River to the Bassac River (the two main north-south rivers that flow through the Mekong Delta) in order to reach its destination on the southern portion of the Bassac. Apparently the troops were somewhat bemused from the heat and the beer consumed and sailed right up into Cambodia, where they were halted by a Cambodian patrol craft and taken to the frontier base and then up to Phnom Penh. Gen. Creighton Abrams, newly in command, was furious, and Adm. Zumwalt's predecessor was nonplussed, blurting out that it wasn't one of his boats.Gen. Abrams snarled, "Yeah, it was one of mine and why did they do it?" We got the crew and LCM back eventually, but that was the only river incident involving the Cambodian border or Navy actions inside Cambodia to my recollection. There were continuing firefights along the Vinh the Canal, which is a kilometer inside the Vietnamese border and stretches straight as a shot from the Gulf of Siam to the Bassac River. The canal fronted the southern Communist base areas inside Cambodia and the Navy patrol craft frequently interdicted Communist infiltrators.There were plenty of incidents on land in 1968 involving U.S. ground forces and aircraft along the 800-mile-plus length of the Cambodian border with Vietnam. A favorite VC/NVA tactic was to pull up next to a Cambodian military post, shoot at the Americans and then leave and let the Cambodians receive American counter-battery fire or aircraft strikes.Finally, concerning the assertion that Mr. Kerry was shot at by the Khmer Rouge during his Christmas 1968 visit to Cambodia, it should be noted that the Khmer Rouge didn't take the field until the Easter Offensive of 1972, when the Vietnamese forces that had attacked the Cambodians initially in March 1970 pulled out of Cambodia to attack the U.S. and Vietnamese forces in Vietnam. Only Vietnamese Communist soldiers were found on the battlefields of Cambodia in 1970-72.The bottom line of all this is that in the 15 years of active American military involvement in Vietnam and Cambodia, between 1961 and 1975, there was ongoing attention and scrutiny paid to the border because of the political sensitivities over the neutrality of the Cambodians. While things may have happened that no one ever found out about in Saigon, the Cambodians yelled bloody murder to the world press and the ICC whenever they found Americans trespassing.
Andrew Antippas served as a Foreign Service officer in the U.S. Embassy in Saigon (March 1968 to February 1970) as the "Cambodia Man" and at the U.S. Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia (1970 to 1972). He spent 32 years with the State Department (1960-92).
Washington TimesAugust 13, 2004 Pg. 21
Fact And Fiction Did Kerry make it to Cambodia?
By Andrew Antippas
I was startled to read the Aug. 10 issue of the editorial page of The Washington Times concerning the assertion attributed to Sen. John Kerry that he had spent Christmas 1968 aboard his swift boat some five miles inside Cambodia and had been shot at by our Vietnamese allies, as well as the Khmer Rouge.I would like to offer some insights and some background about the subject of Cambodia as it related to the U.S. war effort in Vietnam in that period. I served as a Foreign Service officer in the American embassy in Saigon from March 1968 to February 1970 and subsequently at the American embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, from 1970 to 1972.My job in the political section of our embassy in Saigon was to be the "Cambodia Man." My principal tasks were to follow border incidents involving U.S. forces along the Cambodian border. I worked as a liaison with U.S. forces, wrote reports to Washington, followed the intelligence about Communist use of Cambodia and, given that we did not have an embassy in Phnon Penh at that time, maintained contact with the Australian embassies in Saigon and Phnom Penh because the Australians were the U.S. protecting power in Cambodia.I also worked with the International Control Commission (ICC) in Saigon and Phnom Penh.The International Control Commission had been established by the Geneva Agreements of 1954 that ended the French Indochina war. The ICC had separate commission offices in the former French states of Indochina: North and South Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. The offices were to monitor their local military situations. The ICC was staffed by representatives of Canada, Poland and India. While really powerless to enforce the 1954 agreements and the ongoing IndoChina war, the four commissions were kept in place as some sort of presence on the ground. Prince Sihanouk, the head of state of Cambodia, used the ICC to chastise the United States and Republic of Vietnam vigorously and publicly for alleged border incidents. If there was a border incident, he dispatched the ICC to the site. Prince Sihanouk had broken diplomatic relations with the United States in 1965 over continuing border incidents.With the increasing use of Cambodia by the Communists after 1965, the United States offered helicopters and communications equipment to the ICC in Phnom Penh in 1968 to help the commission do its job of locating the more than 12 Communist base areas in the technically "neutral" state of Cambodia. It should be recalled that Communist troops (VC/NVA Viet Cong/North Vietnamese) came out of the sanctuaries in the "Parrot's Beak" area of Cambodia, a mere 35 miles west of Saigon, for the Tet attacks on Saigon in January 1968. However, Prince Sihanouk, as the official host of the ICC, declined the offer of equipment, saying bluntly that the Russians would not be pleased. The Cambodians did agree in 1968 to receive U.S. intelligence about the details of Communist sanctuaries.After Richard Nixon assumed office in 1969, Prince Sihanouk agreed to reopen the U.S. embassy, but insisted on the closure of the Phnom Penh ICC office to keep the political balance between the Communists and the United States.During 1968, there were some 50 "incidents" along the Cambodian border involving U.S. forces. Some of these incidents involved the U.S. "Brown Water Navy." That is, the Navy Riverine Forces, which used small patrol craft such as PBRs and swift boats in the Mekong Delta and along the waterways adjacent to the Cambodian border.I also worked with the Navy on the issue of gun-running through Cambodia. The Navy was particularly seized with the debate over whether the Vietnamese Communists were being resupplied through the "Sihanouk Trail," which was the extension of the Ho Chi Minh Trail, or by sea aboard Chinese freighters and hundred-ton steel-hulled trawlers through the port of Sihanoukville. The Johnson administration demanded proof of the CIA and Navy intelligence positions that postulated that the only way munitions of the amount being expended in South Vietnam's III and IV Corps could be resupplied was by ship. The Navy and local CIA station did a good job of making their case, but the supergrade CIA representatives and the senior State Department officials who came out from Washington to investigate the issue in October 1968 refused to accept that thesis because to do so would require the administration to put heat on Prince Sihanouk to do something about the use of Sihanoukville by the Communists.After Prince Sihanouk's ouster in 1970, we in the embassy in Phnom Penh confirmed the assumptions by the CIA and U.S. Navy in Saigon concerning the trade through "neutral" Cambodia's port of Sihanoukville.I worked closely with Vice Adm. Elmo Zumwalt, who was the commander of naval forces in Vietnam beginning in mid-1968 and before he moved up to become chief of naval operations in 1970. Adm. Zumwalt, unlike most senior American military, had served as an assistant naval attache in Europe as a more junior officer and knew the international political and diplomatic game. Adm. Zumwalt was politically sensitive about the activities of his Riverine units causing border incidents. There were established U.S. forces "rules of engagement" that governed the activities of American forces near the Cambodian border.There was, for example, a "no-fly zone" along the Cambodian border, where U.S. forces ground units, aircraft and boats were prohibited from routinely approaching or entering Cambodia. I should note here that allied forces in Vietnam from Australia, New Zealand, Korea, Thailand and the Philippines were used in areas away from the border just to avoid adding diplomatic problems.As U.S. forces in 1966 and 1967 progressively pushed the Vietnamese Communists farther and farther away from Vietnamese population centers, U.S. commanders sought permission for "hot pursuit" operations against Communist forces attacking from Cambodian territory. This always was denied, much to the military's frustration.The Cambodians patrolled the crossing border points on the Bassac and Mekong Rivers and had fortifications above the frontier. In mid-1968, just before Adm. Zumwalt took over, a U.S. Army LCM landing craft sailing north on the Mekong River — loaded with lubricants, gas, rations, beer and a forklift, as well as a number of U.S. soldiers — missed the turn from the Mekong River to the Bassac River (the two main north-south rivers that flow through the Mekong Delta) in order to reach its destination on the southern portion of the Bassac. Apparently the troops were somewhat bemused from the heat and the beer consumed and sailed right up into Cambodia, where they were halted by a Cambodian patrol craft and taken to the frontier base and then up to Phnom Penh. Gen. Creighton Abrams, newly in command, was furious, and Adm. Zumwalt's predecessor was nonplussed, blurting out that it wasn't one of his boats.Gen. Abrams snarled, "Yeah, it was one of mine and why did they do it?" We got the crew and LCM back eventually, but that was the only river incident involving the Cambodian border or Navy actions inside Cambodia to my recollection. There were continuing firefights along the Vinh the Canal, which is a kilometer inside the Vietnamese border and stretches straight as a shot from the Gulf of Siam to the Bassac River. The canal fronted the southern Communist base areas inside Cambodia and the Navy patrol craft frequently interdicted Communist infiltrators.There were plenty of incidents on land in 1968 involving U.S. ground forces and aircraft along the 800-mile-plus length of the Cambodian border with Vietnam. A favorite VC/NVA tactic was to pull up next to a Cambodian military post, shoot at the Americans and then leave and let the Cambodians receive American counter-battery fire or aircraft strikes.Finally, concerning the assertion that Mr. Kerry was shot at by the Khmer Rouge during his Christmas 1968 visit to Cambodia, it should be noted that the Khmer Rouge didn't take the field until the Easter Offensive of 1972, when the Vietnamese forces that had attacked the Cambodians initially in March 1970 pulled out of Cambodia to attack the U.S. and Vietnamese forces in Vietnam. Only Vietnamese Communist soldiers were found on the battlefields of Cambodia in 1970-72.The bottom line of all this is that in the 15 years of active American military involvement in Vietnam and Cambodia, between 1961 and 1975, there was ongoing attention and scrutiny paid to the border because of the political sensitivities over the neutrality of the Cambodians. While things may have happened that no one ever found out about in Saigon, the Cambodians yelled bloody murder to the world press and the ICC whenever they found Americans trespassing.
Andrew Antippas served as a Foreign Service officer in the U.S. Embassy in Saigon (March 1968 to February 1970) as the "Cambodia Man" and at the U.S. Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia (1970 to 1972). He spent 32 years with the State Department (1960-92).
Another credible voice on Kerry and Viet Nam.
Washington TimesAugust 13, 2004 Pg. 21A
Question Of CharacterIn search of Christmas 1968
By Patrick J. Buchanan
On March 27, 1986, John Kerry rose in the Senate to address the theme that launched his career: How U.S. leaders had lied about Vietnam while young warriors like John Kerry paid the price. His textbook case was how Richard Nixon had lied about U.S. forces not being in Cambodia:"I remember Christmas of 1968, sitting on a gunboat in Cambodia. I remember what it was like to be shot at by the Vietnamese and the Khmer Rouge and Cambodians, and the president of the United States telling the American people I was not there; the troops were not in Cambodia. I have that memory which is seared — seared — in me."Mr. Kerry had told this dramatic story before, in the Boston Herald, Oct. 14, 1979, with a different twist as to who had fired on the young Navy lieutenant on that unforgettable Christmas Eve."On more than one occasion, I, like Martin Sheen in 'Apocalypse Now,' took my patrol boat into Cambodia. In fact, I remember spending Christmas Eve of 1968 five miles across the Cambodian border being shot at by our South Vietnamese allies who were drunk and celebrating Christmas. The absurdity of almost being killed by our own allies in a country in which President Nixon claimed there were no American troops was very real."Just how "very real," how "seared" in Mr. Kerry's memory that raid into Cambodia was — with Mr. Nixon lying about our not being there as Lt. John Kerry took fire — is now open to question.First, because Richard Nixon was not president on Christmas Eve 1968. Lyndon Johnson was. More critically, because Mr. Kerry's fellow swift boat commanders are openly accusing him of lying.Mr. Kerry "was never ordered into Cambodia by anyone and would have been court-martialed had he gone there," writes former swift boat Capt. John O'Neill in the explosive new best-seller, "Unfit to Command." On that Christmas Eve, writes Capt. O'Neill, Kerry was "more than fifty miles away from Cambodia.""During Christmas 1968," writes Capt. O'Neill, "Kerry was stationed at Coastal Division 13 in Cat Lo. Coastal Division 13s patrol area extended to Sa Dec, about 55 miles from the Cambodian border. Areas closer than 55 miles to the Cambodian border in the area of the Mekong River were patrolled by PBRs, a small river patrol craft, and not by Swift Boats.""Preventing border crossings," writes Capt. O'Neill, "was considered so important at that time that an LCU (a large, mechanized landing craft) and several PBRs were stationed to ensure that no one could cross the border. A large sign at the border prohibited entry."According to Capt. O'Neill, all of Mr. Kerry's commanders who are still alive deny he was ever ordered into Cambodia and insist Mr. Kerry would have been court-martialed had he ever taken his boat into Cambodia.If what John O'Neill writes is true — and he has invited Mr. Kerry to sue him for libel — Mr. Kerry has falsified a central event of his life. For Mr. Kerry has used this story repeatedly, and it has been used by admirers to explain how the idealistic young warrior lost his faith in the U.S. government.Nor is this an unserious matter. For the charges against Mr. Kerry in "Unfit for Command" go to an issue the media failed to address in 1992, to the detriment of this country: the issue of character and credibility.Is John Kerry a brave warrior being viciously maligned by swift boat veterans who hate him for having turned against the war and telling the truth about U.S. war crimes? Or has John Kerry been lying about his service in Vietnam and slandering the honorable service of the swift boat veterans to advance his own career, in which case, he should be read out of the company of decent men, not elevated to the presidency?While the full truth about how Mr. Kerry won his medals may never be known, we do know this: Mr. Kerry has backed away from the more lurid charges of genocide against U.S. forces he made when he came home. He misled his biographer, Douglas Brinkley, when he denied being at the Kansas City meeting of Vietnam Veterans Against the War, where the assassination of Sens. Tower, Stennis and Thurmond was discussed. His campaign staff tried to get former VVAW men to disremember that Mr. Kerry was there.Now we have the issue of whether Mr. Kerry has told the truth about a critical moment in his life, that Christmas Eve of 1968 inside Cambodia, where young John Kerry was taking fire as U.S. leaders were lying to the nation by denying we were in Cambodia.There is a simple way to discover who is telling the truth. That is for a journalist to ask Mr. Kerry to elaborate a bit on that Christmas Eve in Cambodia that is so "seared" in his memory and so affected his life.
Patrick J. Buchanan served in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations.
Washington TimesAugust 13, 2004 Pg. 21A
Question Of CharacterIn search of Christmas 1968
By Patrick J. Buchanan
On March 27, 1986, John Kerry rose in the Senate to address the theme that launched his career: How U.S. leaders had lied about Vietnam while young warriors like John Kerry paid the price. His textbook case was how Richard Nixon had lied about U.S. forces not being in Cambodia:"I remember Christmas of 1968, sitting on a gunboat in Cambodia. I remember what it was like to be shot at by the Vietnamese and the Khmer Rouge and Cambodians, and the president of the United States telling the American people I was not there; the troops were not in Cambodia. I have that memory which is seared — seared — in me."Mr. Kerry had told this dramatic story before, in the Boston Herald, Oct. 14, 1979, with a different twist as to who had fired on the young Navy lieutenant on that unforgettable Christmas Eve."On more than one occasion, I, like Martin Sheen in 'Apocalypse Now,' took my patrol boat into Cambodia. In fact, I remember spending Christmas Eve of 1968 five miles across the Cambodian border being shot at by our South Vietnamese allies who were drunk and celebrating Christmas. The absurdity of almost being killed by our own allies in a country in which President Nixon claimed there were no American troops was very real."Just how "very real," how "seared" in Mr. Kerry's memory that raid into Cambodia was — with Mr. Nixon lying about our not being there as Lt. John Kerry took fire — is now open to question.First, because Richard Nixon was not president on Christmas Eve 1968. Lyndon Johnson was. More critically, because Mr. Kerry's fellow swift boat commanders are openly accusing him of lying.Mr. Kerry "was never ordered into Cambodia by anyone and would have been court-martialed had he gone there," writes former swift boat Capt. John O'Neill in the explosive new best-seller, "Unfit to Command." On that Christmas Eve, writes Capt. O'Neill, Kerry was "more than fifty miles away from Cambodia.""During Christmas 1968," writes Capt. O'Neill, "Kerry was stationed at Coastal Division 13 in Cat Lo. Coastal Division 13s patrol area extended to Sa Dec, about 55 miles from the Cambodian border. Areas closer than 55 miles to the Cambodian border in the area of the Mekong River were patrolled by PBRs, a small river patrol craft, and not by Swift Boats.""Preventing border crossings," writes Capt. O'Neill, "was considered so important at that time that an LCU (a large, mechanized landing craft) and several PBRs were stationed to ensure that no one could cross the border. A large sign at the border prohibited entry."According to Capt. O'Neill, all of Mr. Kerry's commanders who are still alive deny he was ever ordered into Cambodia and insist Mr. Kerry would have been court-martialed had he ever taken his boat into Cambodia.If what John O'Neill writes is true — and he has invited Mr. Kerry to sue him for libel — Mr. Kerry has falsified a central event of his life. For Mr. Kerry has used this story repeatedly, and it has been used by admirers to explain how the idealistic young warrior lost his faith in the U.S. government.Nor is this an unserious matter. For the charges against Mr. Kerry in "Unfit for Command" go to an issue the media failed to address in 1992, to the detriment of this country: the issue of character and credibility.Is John Kerry a brave warrior being viciously maligned by swift boat veterans who hate him for having turned against the war and telling the truth about U.S. war crimes? Or has John Kerry been lying about his service in Vietnam and slandering the honorable service of the swift boat veterans to advance his own career, in which case, he should be read out of the company of decent men, not elevated to the presidency?While the full truth about how Mr. Kerry won his medals may never be known, we do know this: Mr. Kerry has backed away from the more lurid charges of genocide against U.S. forces he made when he came home. He misled his biographer, Douglas Brinkley, when he denied being at the Kansas City meeting of Vietnam Veterans Against the War, where the assassination of Sens. Tower, Stennis and Thurmond was discussed. His campaign staff tried to get former VVAW men to disremember that Mr. Kerry was there.Now we have the issue of whether Mr. Kerry has told the truth about a critical moment in his life, that Christmas Eve of 1968 inside Cambodia, where young John Kerry was taking fire as U.S. leaders were lying to the nation by denying we were in Cambodia.There is a simple way to discover who is telling the truth. That is for a journalist to ask Mr. Kerry to elaborate a bit on that Christmas Eve in Cambodia that is so "seared" in his memory and so affected his life.
Patrick J. Buchanan served in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations.
Franks vs Kerry
Forward from a friend:
From “American Soldier” by General Tommy Franks page 114:
(November 1968)
One evening after dinner, Mother helped me with my dress uniform as I prepared to report for duty at Fort Sill-my next duty assignment. …My dad came into the kitchen and watched as I pinned on the campaign ribbons and decorations.“Those are four oak leaf clusters.” I tapped the little pins on the ribbons. “For second or third awards of the same medal.”In his deliberate way, he counted. “Three Purple Hearts.”“I was a big target.” I’d actually been wounded several more times; the Purple Hearts only signified the wounds for which I’d been sent to the hospital.
Let's see now:
Franks:• Had been hospitalized three times for wounds•
Had been wounded several more times•
Received three Purple Hearts•
Had in a full one year tour in Vietnam
Kerry:• Was never hospitalized•
Received three Purple Hearts (at least two have been questioned )•
Left Vietnam at his own request after only 4 months
Franks was advised to wear civilian clothes on the plane ride back home after arriving in the US. The anti-Vietnam atmosphere was about to get a major boost from "hero" Kerry.
http://www.scaryjohnkerry.com/
From “American Soldier” by General Tommy Franks page 114:
(November 1968)
One evening after dinner, Mother helped me with my dress uniform as I prepared to report for duty at Fort Sill-my next duty assignment. …My dad came into the kitchen and watched as I pinned on the campaign ribbons and decorations.“Those are four oak leaf clusters.” I tapped the little pins on the ribbons. “For second or third awards of the same medal.”In his deliberate way, he counted. “Three Purple Hearts.”“I was a big target.” I’d actually been wounded several more times; the Purple Hearts only signified the wounds for which I’d been sent to the hospital.
Let's see now:
Franks:• Had been hospitalized three times for wounds•
Had been wounded several more times•
Received three Purple Hearts•
Had in a full one year tour in Vietnam
Kerry:• Was never hospitalized•
Received three Purple Hearts (at least two have been questioned )•
Left Vietnam at his own request after only 4 months
Franks was advised to wear civilian clothes on the plane ride back home after arriving in the US. The anti-Vietnam atmosphere was about to get a major boost from "hero" Kerry.
http://www.scaryjohnkerry.com/
Sunday, August 08, 2004
Obama and Mephisto - O
Obama’s Faustian Bargain with Mephisto
Why should you support Alan Keyes as Republican candidate for the Illinois Senate? Keyes announced today that he will run against heavily favored Barack Obama, the up-and-coming Democratic Party star?
Not long after George Soros made his ridiculous statements comparing Abu Ghraib with the terrorist attacks on 9/11, Barack Obama, the Democratic candidate for the Senate in Illinois, rushed to join Soros in New York for a fund-raiser on June 7th.
They met at Soros' home, where Obama's received Soros’ personal commitment to his campaign and a large infusion of cash from the Soros family. Prior to meeting with Soros, Obama (not related to Osama) was facing a viable challenge from Republican Jack Ryan. Coincidence that within a short time of their meeting that news broke leaking very personal, and intimate information from Ryan's divorce records? Doubtful, since the potential for personal embarrassment caused Ryan to drop out of the Senate race. Shaking Ryan from the race in order to clear the path for Obama was a doctrinaire matter of business for the Soros machine.
As a result of making his deal with Soros (a.k.a. the devil) Obama joined a growing list of candidates receiving contributions from George Soros. The list includes Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D.; Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y.; Bob Graham, D-Fla.; John Kerry, D-Mass.; Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.; U.S. Rep. Tom Lantos; and former Vermont governor Howard Dean. However it appears that Obama’s political aspirations seemed to be focused more nationally than they do on Illinois, especially if you look at some of the money he's taken from left-coast liberals."
"Why did George support Obama?" "Barack Obama has an extremely liberal voting record. According to Cathy Santos, co-founder of the Chicago-based Republican Young Professionals, "He's more of a socialist than he is even a Democrat. A lot of his policies have the government taking care of people. Instead of giving people a leg up, he would rather give them a leg.” Santos also said if Obama got his way, “ the U.S. health care system would be worse than what Hillary Clinton proposed after her husband was elected president. Voters should be wary of Obama's "any time, anywhere" stance on abortion.”
Obama fits the Soros plan to unravel our country from within. Obama received a bigger bounce from the DNC than did Sen. Kerry. Obama is heading for 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, one way or the other. He appears to have made his choice regarding the pathway he is willing to pursue. He and Soros will use the emotional race card with the black population and to a certain extent other minorities to create a groundswell of support from within the ranks of the common man. He is handsome, articulate, and flamboyant. Forget the fact that he sold his soul to the devil; the liberal media, the Soros machine and Hollywood won’t let that dirty little secret become known.
Get this message to everyone you know, and ask for their support whether Illinois resident or not. At the very least, Alan Keyes can use our moral, emotional and if possible, financial support.
Why should you support Alan Keyes as Republican candidate for the Illinois Senate? Keyes announced today that he will run against heavily favored Barack Obama, the up-and-coming Democratic Party star?
Not long after George Soros made his ridiculous statements comparing Abu Ghraib with the terrorist attacks on 9/11, Barack Obama, the Democratic candidate for the Senate in Illinois, rushed to join Soros in New York for a fund-raiser on June 7th.
They met at Soros' home, where Obama's received Soros’ personal commitment to his campaign and a large infusion of cash from the Soros family. Prior to meeting with Soros, Obama (not related to Osama) was facing a viable challenge from Republican Jack Ryan. Coincidence that within a short time of their meeting that news broke leaking very personal, and intimate information from Ryan's divorce records? Doubtful, since the potential for personal embarrassment caused Ryan to drop out of the Senate race. Shaking Ryan from the race in order to clear the path for Obama was a doctrinaire matter of business for the Soros machine.
As a result of making his deal with Soros (a.k.a. the devil) Obama joined a growing list of candidates receiving contributions from George Soros. The list includes Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D.; Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y.; Bob Graham, D-Fla.; John Kerry, D-Mass.; Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.; U.S. Rep. Tom Lantos; and former Vermont governor Howard Dean. However it appears that Obama’s political aspirations seemed to be focused more nationally than they do on Illinois, especially if you look at some of the money he's taken from left-coast liberals."
"Why did George support Obama?" "Barack Obama has an extremely liberal voting record. According to Cathy Santos, co-founder of the Chicago-based Republican Young Professionals, "He's more of a socialist than he is even a Democrat. A lot of his policies have the government taking care of people. Instead of giving people a leg up, he would rather give them a leg.” Santos also said if Obama got his way, “ the U.S. health care system would be worse than what Hillary Clinton proposed after her husband was elected president. Voters should be wary of Obama's "any time, anywhere" stance on abortion.”
Obama fits the Soros plan to unravel our country from within. Obama received a bigger bounce from the DNC than did Sen. Kerry. Obama is heading for 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, one way or the other. He appears to have made his choice regarding the pathway he is willing to pursue. He and Soros will use the emotional race card with the black population and to a certain extent other minorities to create a groundswell of support from within the ranks of the common man. He is handsome, articulate, and flamboyant. Forget the fact that he sold his soul to the devil; the liberal media, the Soros machine and Hollywood won’t let that dirty little secret become known.
Get this message to everyone you know, and ask for their support whether Illinois resident or not. At the very least, Alan Keyes can use our moral, emotional and if possible, financial support.
Friday, August 06, 2004
On My Mind Today - O
Have you heard of Bonnie Raitt, Huey Lewis, Mickey Hart, Phil Lesh and Bill Kreutzmann, Tommy Castro, Suzanne Ciani, Ramblin’ Jack Elliott, Dan Hicks, the Doobie Brothers, Pete Sears, Roy Rogers, Maria Muldaur or Rob Wasserman?
http://www.musiciansforkerry.com/ hosts the details.
Did you hear that the director of religious outreach for the Democratic Party resigned this week because of mainstream criticism over her support for removing the words "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance?
What is the connection? Just say “No” to God, sponsored by billionaire, George Soros. While he may not write all of the checks himself, his campaign to oust George Bush has ignited a movement unparalleled in recent decades. The common thread between the entertainers who have stepped into the limelight, the filmmakers who have used their resources to create anti-Bush projects and the liberal media seems to be a shared vision for a godless America.
How deep is George Soros’ hatred for George Bush? When asked if he would trade his $7 billion fortune to unseat Bush, Soros opened his mouth, and then he closed it. For a beat the proposal hung in the air: Would he become poor to beat George Bush? He said, "If someone guaranteed it."
George Soros, one of the world's richest men, gave away $5 billion to promote his vision in the former Soviet bloc, Africa and Asia. Now he has a new project and that is defeating President Bush. "It is the central focus of my life, Soros said, a matter of life and death."
What do George Soros and the neolibs want? Open ended abortions so that stem cell research centers will be assured of raw materials. This was stated clearly on the T-shirts of several women at the DNC, “I AM PROUD TO HAVE HAD AN ABORTION – IT IS JUST LIKE LIPOSUCTION, BUT FOR KIDS”. They want open marriages between same gender partners. They want liberal Judges appointed to the anticipated 4-6 seats on the Supreme Court soon to be opened. They want a socialized medical system; health care of everyone, only it won’t work and it won’t ever be equitable because the government would be making decisions about our health care. They want any reference to God removed from – well, everything. By his own admission, he is without conscience; a capitalist who functions with absolute amorality.
A bit about Mr. Soros’ motives:
Soros is best known for currency speculation. In 1997 Malaysia's Mahathir Mohamad, identified him for taking part in a highly profitable attack on that nation's currency. In 1997 George Soros was responsible for the destruction of the Thai economy. He is regarded as a kind of Dracula because he sucks the blood from the very core of economies. The Chinese call him "the crocodile," because his economic and ideological efforts in China were so insatiate, and because his financial speculation created millions of dollars in profits as it ravished the Thai and Malaysian economies.
Soros has financed the campaign of the devil himself. He has promised the desires of the neolib’s hearts as the prize. He promises an open society – free from the repressions of the Patriot Act, free from the scrutiny of law enforcement and FBI.
“Sing, dance, smoke pot, use drugs, life is free and we are free to make our own choices.” That is the nirvana Mr. Soros would promise. He knows that he can gain control of the US economy if he can unravel it. Unfortunately, the uneducated, limited minds of Hollywood and the media sheep have become transfixed by the temptations and have joined forces as soldiers in the Soros army. They can’t help themselves, because they are dumb. “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.”
The campaign to elect John Kerry is empty and pointless. The campaign being sponsored and supported by the neolibs is a campaign to get rid of George Bush and that equates to changing the dynamic of the United States of America once and for all and forever.
The list of the misguided grows daily, and today it even included Bruce Springstein. How sad. Fear not, for where there is light there can be no darkness – we can shed light on the lies of the libs, we can win in November, and we can preserve our future, if we work together and don’t allow the carefully crafted distractions to derail us.
http://www.musiciansforkerry.com/ hosts the details.
Did you hear that the director of religious outreach for the Democratic Party resigned this week because of mainstream criticism over her support for removing the words "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance?
What is the connection? Just say “No” to God, sponsored by billionaire, George Soros. While he may not write all of the checks himself, his campaign to oust George Bush has ignited a movement unparalleled in recent decades. The common thread between the entertainers who have stepped into the limelight, the filmmakers who have used their resources to create anti-Bush projects and the liberal media seems to be a shared vision for a godless America.
How deep is George Soros’ hatred for George Bush? When asked if he would trade his $7 billion fortune to unseat Bush, Soros opened his mouth, and then he closed it. For a beat the proposal hung in the air: Would he become poor to beat George Bush? He said, "If someone guaranteed it."
George Soros, one of the world's richest men, gave away $5 billion to promote his vision in the former Soviet bloc, Africa and Asia. Now he has a new project and that is defeating President Bush. "It is the central focus of my life, Soros said, a matter of life and death."
What do George Soros and the neolibs want? Open ended abortions so that stem cell research centers will be assured of raw materials. This was stated clearly on the T-shirts of several women at the DNC, “I AM PROUD TO HAVE HAD AN ABORTION – IT IS JUST LIKE LIPOSUCTION, BUT FOR KIDS”. They want open marriages between same gender partners. They want liberal Judges appointed to the anticipated 4-6 seats on the Supreme Court soon to be opened. They want a socialized medical system; health care of everyone, only it won’t work and it won’t ever be equitable because the government would be making decisions about our health care. They want any reference to God removed from – well, everything. By his own admission, he is without conscience; a capitalist who functions with absolute amorality.
A bit about Mr. Soros’ motives:
Soros is best known for currency speculation. In 1997 Malaysia's Mahathir Mohamad, identified him for taking part in a highly profitable attack on that nation's currency. In 1997 George Soros was responsible for the destruction of the Thai economy. He is regarded as a kind of Dracula because he sucks the blood from the very core of economies. The Chinese call him "the crocodile," because his economic and ideological efforts in China were so insatiate, and because his financial speculation created millions of dollars in profits as it ravished the Thai and Malaysian economies.
Soros has financed the campaign of the devil himself. He has promised the desires of the neolib’s hearts as the prize. He promises an open society – free from the repressions of the Patriot Act, free from the scrutiny of law enforcement and FBI.
“Sing, dance, smoke pot, use drugs, life is free and we are free to make our own choices.” That is the nirvana Mr. Soros would promise. He knows that he can gain control of the US economy if he can unravel it. Unfortunately, the uneducated, limited minds of Hollywood and the media sheep have become transfixed by the temptations and have joined forces as soldiers in the Soros army. They can’t help themselves, because they are dumb. “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.”
The campaign to elect John Kerry is empty and pointless. The campaign being sponsored and supported by the neolibs is a campaign to get rid of George Bush and that equates to changing the dynamic of the United States of America once and for all and forever.
The list of the misguided grows daily, and today it even included Bruce Springstein. How sad. Fear not, for where there is light there can be no darkness – we can shed light on the lies of the libs, we can win in November, and we can preserve our future, if we work together and don’t allow the carefully crafted distractions to derail us.
French Connection
The Washington Times www.washingtontimes.com French connection
By Diana WestPublished August 6, 2004
Whenever Sen. John Kerry rips the Bush administration for "going it alone" in Iraq -- which he does with near-digital regularity -- I cringe. What must our friends around the world think of such Beacon Hill provincialism? Surely, the man's open disdain for allied forces in Iraq, great and small, conveys an alienating lack of diplomatic politesse.
In Mr. Kerry's insistence that the commitment of our allies -- British, Italian, Polish, Ukrainian, Dutch, Australian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Japanese, Thai, Danish and others -- adds up to a big fat zero in a "unilateral" American adventure, he has shown himself bereft of all diplomatic smarts. Talk about an Ugly American. Only this one speaks perfect French. That explains a lot. That is, while the assistance of thirty-odd countries in newly sovereign Iraq isn't exactly chopped liver, the real problem, when it comes to John Kerry, is that it isn't foie gras. In other words, when Mr. Kerry castigates President Bush for acting "solo" in Iraq, what he's really crabbing about is that the United States is acting without France.
For Mr. Kerry and his Francophile set, acting sans France is a major problem, a veritable crisis. Since he is one of two men who will occupy the White House next year, his crisis is our concern. First of all, Americans need to ponder what sort of American leader, to borrow a phrase from former Ambassador Jean Kirkpatrick, always blames America first -- and, in recent times, always blames France last. This is the brave, new philosophical reflex that gives impetus to the Kerry doctrine. In Mr. Kerry's world, Mr. Bush (in concert with Great Britain's Tony Blair) was all wrong to deviate from the policies of La France regarding Saddam Hussein. After veto-empowered France withheld Security Council approval for U.S.-led military action in Iraq, Mr. Bush was all wrong again to defy France, enforce umpteen U.N. Security Council resolutions and actually liberate Iraq -- thus, according to Mr. Kerry, "alienating" our "traditional allies." (Traditional as in Germany? China? Russia?)
But why the Francophilia in the first place? It's true Mr. Kerry has French relatives. His first cousin, Brice Lalonde, is not only mayor of the Brittany resort where Mr. Kerry summered as a boy, but is also a onetime Green Party candidate for president (of France) and a former socialist environmental minister. Far from a matter of divided loyalty, however, Mr. Kerry's attitudes stem from a shared sensibility. Scholar Victor Davis Hanson recently suggested that to square Europe's anti-American rhetoric with its embrace of Valley Girl culture we should regard Western Europeans as "elite Americans." He writes: "Their upscale leisured culture is not much different from Malibu, Austin and Dupont Circle that likewise excuse their crass submission to popular American tastes through the de rigeur slurs about the 'corporations,' 'Bush-Cheney,' and 'Halliburton' ." And, I would add, vice versa. The key to elite Americans, a la John Kerry Democrats, lies in understanding Western Europeans -- probably best exemplified by the French.
It's extraordinary to behold the hatred for Mr. Bush that unifies this Malibu-Austin-Paris axis. Typical is the sentiment of Sen. Ted Kennedy, who, speaking before the Democratic convention, twisted FDR's inspirational words of the Depression into "all we have to fear is four more years of George Bush." This thrilled, no doubt, Western Europe's blue-state-style salons. Why? The answer is startling, one John Kerry himself is unlikely to grasp.
About 30 years ago, historian Bat Ye'or tells us, France initiated a sweeping set of political, cultural and immigration policies designed to align Europe with the Muslim Arab world. This would form what she calls "Eurabia" -- the title of her upcoming book. This alignment "would endow Europe -- and especially France, the project's prime mover -- with a weight and a prestige to rival that of the United States." After September 11, France certainly has thrown that weight around, blocking, when possible, Mr. Bush's visionary efforts to remake the Middle East even as he fights global jihad. In Bat Ye'or's analysis, France-led Europe denies the reality of global jihad, much of which, after 30 years of Muslim immigration, occupies a European battleground.
In this European state of denial -- not altogether dissimilar, I'd say, to Democrats' dismissive attitudes toward global jihad -- the real menace in the world comes from Bush-led America, along with anyone-led Israel. "What must be understood," Bat Ye'or writes, "is that American and Israeli policies of resistance to jihadist terror provoke reprisals against a Europe that has long ago ceased to defend itself. So that peace can prevail throughout the world, those two countries, America and Israel, need only adopt the European strategy of constant surrender, based on the denial of aggression."
Denial of aggression? Constant surrender? Let's hope so goes France, so goes the nation -- or not.
By Diana WestPublished August 6, 2004
Whenever Sen. John Kerry rips the Bush administration for "going it alone" in Iraq -- which he does with near-digital regularity -- I cringe. What must our friends around the world think of such Beacon Hill provincialism? Surely, the man's open disdain for allied forces in Iraq, great and small, conveys an alienating lack of diplomatic politesse.
In Mr. Kerry's insistence that the commitment of our allies -- British, Italian, Polish, Ukrainian, Dutch, Australian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Japanese, Thai, Danish and others -- adds up to a big fat zero in a "unilateral" American adventure, he has shown himself bereft of all diplomatic smarts. Talk about an Ugly American. Only this one speaks perfect French. That explains a lot. That is, while the assistance of thirty-odd countries in newly sovereign Iraq isn't exactly chopped liver, the real problem, when it comes to John Kerry, is that it isn't foie gras. In other words, when Mr. Kerry castigates President Bush for acting "solo" in Iraq, what he's really crabbing about is that the United States is acting without France.
For Mr. Kerry and his Francophile set, acting sans France is a major problem, a veritable crisis. Since he is one of two men who will occupy the White House next year, his crisis is our concern. First of all, Americans need to ponder what sort of American leader, to borrow a phrase from former Ambassador Jean Kirkpatrick, always blames America first -- and, in recent times, always blames France last. This is the brave, new philosophical reflex that gives impetus to the Kerry doctrine. In Mr. Kerry's world, Mr. Bush (in concert with Great Britain's Tony Blair) was all wrong to deviate from the policies of La France regarding Saddam Hussein. After veto-empowered France withheld Security Council approval for U.S.-led military action in Iraq, Mr. Bush was all wrong again to defy France, enforce umpteen U.N. Security Council resolutions and actually liberate Iraq -- thus, according to Mr. Kerry, "alienating" our "traditional allies." (Traditional as in Germany? China? Russia?)
But why the Francophilia in the first place? It's true Mr. Kerry has French relatives. His first cousin, Brice Lalonde, is not only mayor of the Brittany resort where Mr. Kerry summered as a boy, but is also a onetime Green Party candidate for president (of France) and a former socialist environmental minister. Far from a matter of divided loyalty, however, Mr. Kerry's attitudes stem from a shared sensibility. Scholar Victor Davis Hanson recently suggested that to square Europe's anti-American rhetoric with its embrace of Valley Girl culture we should regard Western Europeans as "elite Americans." He writes: "Their upscale leisured culture is not much different from Malibu, Austin and Dupont Circle that likewise excuse their crass submission to popular American tastes through the de rigeur slurs about the 'corporations,' 'Bush-Cheney,' and 'Halliburton' ." And, I would add, vice versa. The key to elite Americans, a la John Kerry Democrats, lies in understanding Western Europeans -- probably best exemplified by the French.
It's extraordinary to behold the hatred for Mr. Bush that unifies this Malibu-Austin-Paris axis. Typical is the sentiment of Sen. Ted Kennedy, who, speaking before the Democratic convention, twisted FDR's inspirational words of the Depression into "all we have to fear is four more years of George Bush." This thrilled, no doubt, Western Europe's blue-state-style salons. Why? The answer is startling, one John Kerry himself is unlikely to grasp.
About 30 years ago, historian Bat Ye'or tells us, France initiated a sweeping set of political, cultural and immigration policies designed to align Europe with the Muslim Arab world. This would form what she calls "Eurabia" -- the title of her upcoming book. This alignment "would endow Europe -- and especially France, the project's prime mover -- with a weight and a prestige to rival that of the United States." After September 11, France certainly has thrown that weight around, blocking, when possible, Mr. Bush's visionary efforts to remake the Middle East even as he fights global jihad. In Bat Ye'or's analysis, France-led Europe denies the reality of global jihad, much of which, after 30 years of Muslim immigration, occupies a European battleground.
In this European state of denial -- not altogether dissimilar, I'd say, to Democrats' dismissive attitudes toward global jihad -- the real menace in the world comes from Bush-led America, along with anyone-led Israel. "What must be understood," Bat Ye'or writes, "is that American and Israeli policies of resistance to jihadist terror provoke reprisals against a Europe that has long ago ceased to defend itself. So that peace can prevail throughout the world, those two countries, America and Israel, need only adopt the European strategy of constant surrender, based on the denial of aggression."
Denial of aggression? Constant surrender? Let's hope so goes France, so goes the nation -- or not.
Thursday, August 05, 2004
Oh Buga Buga We Are So Afraid!
Thursday, August 5, 2004
ELECTION 2004 Dems press TV stations to shun vets' ad
DNC, Kerry campaign warn of 'libel' by Vietnam colleagues
Posted: August 5, 20045:47 p.m. Eastern© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Lawyers for the Democratic National Committee and Sen. John Kerry's presidential campaign have faxed a letter to television station managers warning them not to broadcast an ad by Kerry's Vietnam colleagues which asserts the candidate is lying about his service during the war.The letter, posted by Human Events Online [Requires PDF viewer], tells the managers if they decide to air the ad they are "responsible for the false and libelous charges" made by the group, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.As WorldNetDaily reported, the new TV commercial is a montage of remarks from a number of veterans who accuse Kerry of misrepresenting his actions for medals and attack his character.
The letter is signed by Kerry-Edwards 2004 general counsel Marc Elias and Democratic National Committee general counsel Joseph Sandler.The lawyers say the advertisement "contains statements by men who purport to have served on Senator Kerry's SWIFT Boat in Vietnam and one statement by a man pretending to be the doctor who treated Senator Kerry for one of his injuries.""In fact," the lawyers contend, "not a single one of the men who pretend to have served with Senator Kerry was actually a crewmate of Senator Kerry's and the man pretending to be his doctor was not.""The entire advertisement, therefore," the letter states, "is an inflammatory, outrageous lie."
The vets in the ad, however, do not claim to have been members of Kerry's crew but say they served with him in his unit or were in the Naval chain of command.Some, including crew members on swift boats that went on missions with Kerry, say they were witnesses of events related to his medals.The lawyers call Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth a "sham organization spearheaded by a Texas corporate media consultant."The swift-boats group, which says it has the support of more than 250 veterans, claims only one of 23 surviving commanders who served with Kerry believes he is fit to be commander in chief.
The "Band of Brothers" that has backed Kerry on the campaign trail is comprised of nine of the 10 crew members who served under him on two separate boats. The 10th crew member, Steve Gardner, a gunner's mate, strongly backs the contentions of Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth.
Bandaid wound?The lawyer's letter asserts the doctor, Louis Letson, "was not a crewmate of Senator Kerry's and was not the physician who actually signed Senator Kerry's sick call sheet."Letson has never said he was a crewmate, and a Swift Boats spokesman pointed out sick call sheets usually are signed by an orderly, not the doctor.In the ad, Letson is identified as "lieutenant commander, medical center.""I know John Kerry is lying about his first Purple Heart because I treated him for that injury," Letson says before the camera.The lawyers note Letson, according to news reports, "did not record his 'memories' of the incident until after Senator Kerry became a candidate for president in 2003."
As WorldNetDaily reported, Letson said the wound that made John Kerry eligible for the first of three Purple Hearts was not severe enough to warrant consideration.Kerry came to sick bay for treatment Dec. 3, 1968, one day after arriving back from a patrol north of Cam Ranh, Letson said in a written statement."The story [Kerry] told was different from what his crewmen had to say about that night," Letson said. "According to Kerry, they had been engaged in a fire fight, receiving small arms fire from on shore. He said that his injury resulted from this enemy action."Crew members, however, told Letson the injury was caused by a grenade launcher fired at close range to rocks on shore, which caused a small piece of metal to stick "very superficially in the skin of Kerry’s arm," about one centimeter in length and two or three millimeters in diameter."I simply removed the piece of metal by lifting it out of the skin with forceps," Letson said, noting it penetrated no more than three or four millimeters."It did not require probing to find it, did not require any anesthesia to remove it, and did not require any sutures to close the wound," he said."The wound was covered with a bandaid."
Letson said he remembers "J. C. (Jess) Carreon was present at the time and he, in fact, made the entry into Lt. Kerry’s medical record which has only recently been made available to the public."'Unequivocally false'"The statements made by the phony 'crewmates' and 'doctor' who appear in the advertisement are also totally, demonstrably and unequivocally false, and libelous," the lawyers contend."In particular, the advertisement charges that Senator Kerry 'lied to get his Bronze Star,'" they write. "Just as falsely, it states that 'he lied before the Senate.'
These are serious allegations of actual crimes -- specifically of lying to the United States government in the conduct of its official business."The lawyers tell station managers they are not obligated to air the ad because Swift Boat Vets is not a federal candidate or candidate committee and therefore subject to FCC "use" rules."Moreover," they say, "as a licensee, you have an overriding duty to protect this public from false, misleading or deceptive advertising."Under these circumstances, your station may not responsibly air this advertisement. We request that your station act immediately to prevent broadcasts of this advertisement and deny any future sale of time. Knowing that the advertisement is false, and possessing the legal authority to refuse to run it, your station should exercise that authority in the public interest."
The lawyers conclude: "Please contact us promptly at either of the phone numbers below to advise us regarding the status of this advertisement."
ELECTION 2004 Dems press TV stations to shun vets' ad
DNC, Kerry campaign warn of 'libel' by Vietnam colleagues
Posted: August 5, 20045:47 p.m. Eastern© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Lawyers for the Democratic National Committee and Sen. John Kerry's presidential campaign have faxed a letter to television station managers warning them not to broadcast an ad by Kerry's Vietnam colleagues which asserts the candidate is lying about his service during the war.The letter, posted by Human Events Online [Requires PDF viewer], tells the managers if they decide to air the ad they are "responsible for the false and libelous charges" made by the group, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.As WorldNetDaily reported, the new TV commercial is a montage of remarks from a number of veterans who accuse Kerry of misrepresenting his actions for medals and attack his character.
The letter is signed by Kerry-Edwards 2004 general counsel Marc Elias and Democratic National Committee general counsel Joseph Sandler.The lawyers say the advertisement "contains statements by men who purport to have served on Senator Kerry's SWIFT Boat in Vietnam and one statement by a man pretending to be the doctor who treated Senator Kerry for one of his injuries.""In fact," the lawyers contend, "not a single one of the men who pretend to have served with Senator Kerry was actually a crewmate of Senator Kerry's and the man pretending to be his doctor was not.""The entire advertisement, therefore," the letter states, "is an inflammatory, outrageous lie."
The vets in the ad, however, do not claim to have been members of Kerry's crew but say they served with him in his unit or were in the Naval chain of command.Some, including crew members on swift boats that went on missions with Kerry, say they were witnesses of events related to his medals.The lawyers call Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth a "sham organization spearheaded by a Texas corporate media consultant."The swift-boats group, which says it has the support of more than 250 veterans, claims only one of 23 surviving commanders who served with Kerry believes he is fit to be commander in chief.
The "Band of Brothers" that has backed Kerry on the campaign trail is comprised of nine of the 10 crew members who served under him on two separate boats. The 10th crew member, Steve Gardner, a gunner's mate, strongly backs the contentions of Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth.
Bandaid wound?The lawyer's letter asserts the doctor, Louis Letson, "was not a crewmate of Senator Kerry's and was not the physician who actually signed Senator Kerry's sick call sheet."Letson has never said he was a crewmate, and a Swift Boats spokesman pointed out sick call sheets usually are signed by an orderly, not the doctor.In the ad, Letson is identified as "lieutenant commander, medical center.""I know John Kerry is lying about his first Purple Heart because I treated him for that injury," Letson says before the camera.The lawyers note Letson, according to news reports, "did not record his 'memories' of the incident until after Senator Kerry became a candidate for president in 2003."
As WorldNetDaily reported, Letson said the wound that made John Kerry eligible for the first of three Purple Hearts was not severe enough to warrant consideration.Kerry came to sick bay for treatment Dec. 3, 1968, one day after arriving back from a patrol north of Cam Ranh, Letson said in a written statement."The story [Kerry] told was different from what his crewmen had to say about that night," Letson said. "According to Kerry, they had been engaged in a fire fight, receiving small arms fire from on shore. He said that his injury resulted from this enemy action."Crew members, however, told Letson the injury was caused by a grenade launcher fired at close range to rocks on shore, which caused a small piece of metal to stick "very superficially in the skin of Kerry’s arm," about one centimeter in length and two or three millimeters in diameter."I simply removed the piece of metal by lifting it out of the skin with forceps," Letson said, noting it penetrated no more than three or four millimeters."It did not require probing to find it, did not require any anesthesia to remove it, and did not require any sutures to close the wound," he said."The wound was covered with a bandaid."
Letson said he remembers "J. C. (Jess) Carreon was present at the time and he, in fact, made the entry into Lt. Kerry’s medical record which has only recently been made available to the public."'Unequivocally false'"The statements made by the phony 'crewmates' and 'doctor' who appear in the advertisement are also totally, demonstrably and unequivocally false, and libelous," the lawyers contend."In particular, the advertisement charges that Senator Kerry 'lied to get his Bronze Star,'" they write. "Just as falsely, it states that 'he lied before the Senate.'
These are serious allegations of actual crimes -- specifically of lying to the United States government in the conduct of its official business."The lawyers tell station managers they are not obligated to air the ad because Swift Boat Vets is not a federal candidate or candidate committee and therefore subject to FCC "use" rules."Moreover," they say, "as a licensee, you have an overriding duty to protect this public from false, misleading or deceptive advertising."Under these circumstances, your station may not responsibly air this advertisement. We request that your station act immediately to prevent broadcasts of this advertisement and deny any future sale of time. Knowing that the advertisement is false, and possessing the legal authority to refuse to run it, your station should exercise that authority in the public interest."
The lawyers conclude: "Please contact us promptly at either of the phone numbers below to advise us regarding the status of this advertisement."
Wednesday, August 04, 2004
ACLU on Pizza - O
Click onto the following website and prepare yourself for a heart attack. This is the ACLU at its finest. It is no wonder that a fool like Moore could get away with his factitious propaganda when we have organizations spewing the kind of tactics being presented on the following website:
http://www.aclu.org/pizza/
Please note that some of the basic information may be correct. Our airlines do provide the INS and Homeland Security with information about passengers. That is how we catch and detain Visa overstay tourists, people on international watch lists and the bad guys.
http://www.aclu.org/pizza/
Please note that some of the basic information may be correct. Our airlines do provide the INS and Homeland Security with information about passengers. That is how we catch and detain Visa overstay tourists, people on international watch lists and the bad guys.
Mrs. John Kerry
Regardless of your party preference, this is interesting, and surprising, reading.
Following is a brief background on Mrs. John Kerry. She hates being called that, by the way:
Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-Ferreira Heinz Kerry.
Married SenatorKerry in 1995.
She only took his name eighteen months ago and she is an "interesting" paradox of conflicts.
If you thought John Kerry was scary, he doesn't hold a candle to his wife! Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-Ferreira Heinz Kerry was born in Mozambique, the daughter of a Portuguese physician, was educated in Switzerland and South Africa . Fluent in five languages, she was working as a United Nations interpreter in Geneva in the mid-60's when she met a "handsome" young American, H. John Heinz, III, who worked at a bank in Geneva . He told her his family was "in the food business." They were married in 1966 and returned to Pittsburgh where his>family ran the giant H. J. Heinz food company. He was elected to the US House of Representatives in 1971, and in 1976 he was elected to the first of three terms in the United States Senate. A Republican, he wrote a burning diatribe against some of the causes backed by young House member John Kerry.)
Several years later, in 1991, he was killed when his plane collided with a Sun Oil Company helicopter over a Philadelphia suburb. The senator, his pilot and copilot, and both of Sun's helicopter pilots were killed. He was survived by his wife, Teresa, and their three young sons. Four years later, having inherited Heinz's $500 million fortune, she married Senator John Forbes Kerry, the liberal then-junior senator from Massachusetts . She became a registered Democrat and the process of her radicalization was set in motion. Heinz Kerry is not shy about telling people that she required Kerry to sign a prenuptial agreement before they were married. John Kerry may not have check writing privileges on the Heinz catsup and pickle fortune, but he is certainly a willing and uncomplaining beneficiary of it.
A lot of hard-earned money, made through many years of hawking catsup, mustard, and pickles has fallen into the hands of two people who despise successful entrepreneurship and who believe in the confiscatory redistribution of wealth. So how does Mrs. Heinz Kerry spend John Heinz's money?
Just one example: According to the G2 Bulletin, an online intelligence newsletter of WorldNetDaily, in the years between 1995-2001 she gave more than $4 million to an organization called the Tides Foundation. And what does the Tides Foundation do with John Heinz's money? They support numerous antiwar groups, including Ramsey Clark's International Action Center . Clark has offered to defend Saddam Hussein when he's tried. They support the Democratic Justice Fund, a joint venture of the Tides Foundation and billionaire hate-monger George Soros. The Democratic Justice Fund seeks to ease restrictions on Muslim immigration from "terrorist" states. They support the Council for American-Islamic Relations, whose leaders are known to have close ties to the terrorist group, Hamas. They support the National Lawyers Guild, organized as a communist >front during the Cold War era. One of their attorneys, Lynne Stewart, has been arrested for helping a client, Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, communicate with terror cells in Egypt . He is the convicted mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. They support the "Barrio Warriors," a radical Hispanic group whose primary goal is to return all of Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas to Mexico . These are but a few of the radical groups that benefit, through the anonymity provided by the Tides Foundation, from the generosity of our would-be first lady, the wealthy widow of Republican senator John Heinz, and now the wife of the Democratic senator who aspires to be the 44th President of the United States .
Aiding and supporting our enemies is not good for America , regardless of your political views. If voters will open their eyes, educate themselves and see the real Teresa Heinz Kerry, they will not appreciate her position as ultra rich fairy godmother of the radical left. They will not want to imagine her laying her head on a pillow each night inches away from the President of the United States . Hopefully they love this country enough to decide that the only way these two will ever be allowed into the White House is with an engraved invitation in hand.
Instead of deleting this, pass it on. Let everyone know these people are unfit to represent this great nation. The uninformed will never hear the truth from the press, who wants Kerry elected! Those who buy the Kerry facade, beware what you vote for - - - you may regret that you got it!
Following is a brief background on Mrs. John Kerry. She hates being called that, by the way:
Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-Ferreira Heinz Kerry.
Married SenatorKerry in 1995.
She only took his name eighteen months ago and she is an "interesting" paradox of conflicts.
If you thought John Kerry was scary, he doesn't hold a candle to his wife! Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-Ferreira Heinz Kerry was born in Mozambique, the daughter of a Portuguese physician, was educated in Switzerland and South Africa . Fluent in five languages, she was working as a United Nations interpreter in Geneva in the mid-60's when she met a "handsome" young American, H. John Heinz, III, who worked at a bank in Geneva . He told her his family was "in the food business." They were married in 1966 and returned to Pittsburgh where his>family ran the giant H. J. Heinz food company. He was elected to the US House of Representatives in 1971, and in 1976 he was elected to the first of three terms in the United States Senate. A Republican, he wrote a burning diatribe against some of the causes backed by young House member John Kerry.)
Several years later, in 1991, he was killed when his plane collided with a Sun Oil Company helicopter over a Philadelphia suburb. The senator, his pilot and copilot, and both of Sun's helicopter pilots were killed. He was survived by his wife, Teresa, and their three young sons. Four years later, having inherited Heinz's $500 million fortune, she married Senator John Forbes Kerry, the liberal then-junior senator from Massachusetts . She became a registered Democrat and the process of her radicalization was set in motion. Heinz Kerry is not shy about telling people that she required Kerry to sign a prenuptial agreement before they were married. John Kerry may not have check writing privileges on the Heinz catsup and pickle fortune, but he is certainly a willing and uncomplaining beneficiary of it.
A lot of hard-earned money, made through many years of hawking catsup, mustard, and pickles has fallen into the hands of two people who despise successful entrepreneurship and who believe in the confiscatory redistribution of wealth. So how does Mrs. Heinz Kerry spend John Heinz's money?
Just one example: According to the G2 Bulletin, an online intelligence newsletter of WorldNetDaily, in the years between 1995-2001 she gave more than $4 million to an organization called the Tides Foundation. And what does the Tides Foundation do with John Heinz's money? They support numerous antiwar groups, including Ramsey Clark's International Action Center . Clark has offered to defend Saddam Hussein when he's tried. They support the Democratic Justice Fund, a joint venture of the Tides Foundation and billionaire hate-monger George Soros. The Democratic Justice Fund seeks to ease restrictions on Muslim immigration from "terrorist" states. They support the Council for American-Islamic Relations, whose leaders are known to have close ties to the terrorist group, Hamas. They support the National Lawyers Guild, organized as a communist >front during the Cold War era. One of their attorneys, Lynne Stewart, has been arrested for helping a client, Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, communicate with terror cells in Egypt . He is the convicted mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. They support the "Barrio Warriors," a radical Hispanic group whose primary goal is to return all of Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas to Mexico . These are but a few of the radical groups that benefit, through the anonymity provided by the Tides Foundation, from the generosity of our would-be first lady, the wealthy widow of Republican senator John Heinz, and now the wife of the Democratic senator who aspires to be the 44th President of the United States .
Aiding and supporting our enemies is not good for America , regardless of your political views. If voters will open their eyes, educate themselves and see the real Teresa Heinz Kerry, they will not appreciate her position as ultra rich fairy godmother of the radical left. They will not want to imagine her laying her head on a pillow each night inches away from the President of the United States . Hopefully they love this country enough to decide that the only way these two will ever be allowed into the White House is with an engraved invitation in hand.
Instead of deleting this, pass it on. Let everyone know these people are unfit to represent this great nation. The uninformed will never hear the truth from the press, who wants Kerry elected! Those who buy the Kerry facade, beware what you vote for - - - you may regret that you got it!
Former POWs Reject Kerry's Bid
Washington Times August 4, 2004 Pg. 4
Former POWs Reject Kerry's Bid
By Richard Tomkins, United Press International
Sen. John Kerry's bid to become commander in chief of wartime America has opened old wounds among some former Vietnam-era prisoners of war who bristle over the Massachusetts Democrat's anti-war activism.His activities and statements, pushed out of sight by a campaign that spotlights Mr. Kerry's service in Vietnam, were used by the POWs' North Vietnamese captors to sap the morale of prisoners and U.S. troops still in the field in South Vietnam, say former POWs."They were always talking about [anti-war demonstrations], and they picked right up on Kerry's throwaway line, 'Don't be the last man to die in a lost cause, or die for a lost cause,'" said Kenneth Cordier, an Air Force pilot who spent 2,284 days as a prisoner.
"They repeated that incessantly."They used these photographs and inputs, voice tapes, whatever, from these peace people to try to convince us the whole country had turned anti-war and we were showing a very bad attitude and would never go home."Jim Warner, a prisoner of the North Vietnamese in the Hoa Lo prison complex — known to U.S. servicemen as the Hanoi Hilton — does remember.
In 1971, a North Vietnamese guard and interrogator nicknamed "Boris" by the prisoners pulled papers from his pocket and gave them to Mr. Warner to think about, he said.Apart from clippings from a leftist newspaper in the United States, there was a typewritten transcript of Mr. Kerry's testimony before a U.S. Senate panel in which he repeated charges that U.S. troops were committing atrocities routinely, attacked the war and said communism was not a threat in Vietnam.Mr. Warner said Mr. Kerry and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, which had staged large demonstrations in Washington, were often mentioned in the radio broadcasts that played incessantly over the camp's loudspeakers. Mr. Cordier doesn't recall Mr. Kerry's name being used in interrogations, propaganda broadcasts on radio or during "attitude checks" — political indoctrination sessions.But he said he remembers the North Vietnamese using photographs of war veterans throwing military medals over the White House fence.
Mr. Cordier and Mr. Warner said that although the war protest propaganda was sometimes disheartening, the North Vietnamese failed in their attempts to use it to break the prisoners' will."It didn't make us want to give up, it just made us feel discouraged that there were people who felt that way about us," Mr. Warner said.During the Democratic National Convention in Boston last week, many anti-Kerry veterans' groups participated in demonstrations opposing his campaign for the nation's top job. Other groups are planning more demonstrations.
Mr. Cordier said he is bothered not just by Mr. Kerry's anti-war past, but his record till now, including his voting against funds for troops in Iraq."The measure of a person's character is their whole history up until the present," Mr. Cordier said.
Former POWs Reject Kerry's Bid
By Richard Tomkins, United Press International
Sen. John Kerry's bid to become commander in chief of wartime America has opened old wounds among some former Vietnam-era prisoners of war who bristle over the Massachusetts Democrat's anti-war activism.His activities and statements, pushed out of sight by a campaign that spotlights Mr. Kerry's service in Vietnam, were used by the POWs' North Vietnamese captors to sap the morale of prisoners and U.S. troops still in the field in South Vietnam, say former POWs."They were always talking about [anti-war demonstrations], and they picked right up on Kerry's throwaway line, 'Don't be the last man to die in a lost cause, or die for a lost cause,'" said Kenneth Cordier, an Air Force pilot who spent 2,284 days as a prisoner.
"They repeated that incessantly."They used these photographs and inputs, voice tapes, whatever, from these peace people to try to convince us the whole country had turned anti-war and we were showing a very bad attitude and would never go home."Jim Warner, a prisoner of the North Vietnamese in the Hoa Lo prison complex — known to U.S. servicemen as the Hanoi Hilton — does remember.
In 1971, a North Vietnamese guard and interrogator nicknamed "Boris" by the prisoners pulled papers from his pocket and gave them to Mr. Warner to think about, he said.Apart from clippings from a leftist newspaper in the United States, there was a typewritten transcript of Mr. Kerry's testimony before a U.S. Senate panel in which he repeated charges that U.S. troops were committing atrocities routinely, attacked the war and said communism was not a threat in Vietnam.Mr. Warner said Mr. Kerry and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, which had staged large demonstrations in Washington, were often mentioned in the radio broadcasts that played incessantly over the camp's loudspeakers. Mr. Cordier doesn't recall Mr. Kerry's name being used in interrogations, propaganda broadcasts on radio or during "attitude checks" — political indoctrination sessions.But he said he remembers the North Vietnamese using photographs of war veterans throwing military medals over the White House fence.
Mr. Cordier and Mr. Warner said that although the war protest propaganda was sometimes disheartening, the North Vietnamese failed in their attempts to use it to break the prisoners' will."It didn't make us want to give up, it just made us feel discouraged that there were people who felt that way about us," Mr. Warner said.During the Democratic National Convention in Boston last week, many anti-Kerry veterans' groups participated in demonstrations opposing his campaign for the nation's top job. Other groups are planning more demonstrations.
Mr. Cordier said he is bothered not just by Mr. Kerry's anti-war past, but his record till now, including his voting against funds for troops in Iraq."The measure of a person's character is their whole history up until the present," Mr. Cordier said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)